The Storm Hits the Art Market
news.artnet.com
The Storm Hits the Art Market
1–10 of 221 posts
Re: The Storm Hits the Art Market
#2Re: The Storm Hits the Art Market
#3Re: The Storm Hits the Art Market
#4Re: The Storm Hits the Art Market
#5> Valentine said ... "Asking $20,000 for a work in an artist’s first show is unsustainable"
none of the separate participants in this article are willing to acknowledge that these are related problems.
there is no price discovery in the art world, and it was only just beginning to happen in the pandemic era flush with cash
when you question the price or try to find any rational trend, the gallery director gaslights you into the prior quote "you should just love the piece!" okay but why should I love it at this price "because it will be another price in the future!" but why will it be another price who sets that price "we the gallery do! it moves up over time!" how does that work "you should just love the piece!"
Re: The Storm Hits the Art Market
#6Isn’t the money being invested in crypto instead? Rich people might prefer others better ways to protect their assets than the current art market
Re: The Storm Hits the Art Market
#7It would be tempting to see if there is a correlation in when the “legit” art world price going off a cliff and the NFT bubble, because that suckered in a lot of the idiot end of the speculator crowd.
Re: The Storm Hits the Art Market
#8This is really the art as speculation fad coming home to roost. The people actually interested in art as art are now on things like Instagram buying direct from the artists with very little gatekeeping either by art schools or galleries. It would be tempting to see if there is a correlation in when the “legit” art world price going off a cliff and the NFT bubble, because that suckered in a lot of the idiot end of the…
Re: The Storm Hits the Art Market
#9Re: The Storm Hits the Art Market
#10[0] https://www.lseg.com/en/risk-intelligence/financial-crime-ri...