This was already the case for almost every other country. Most embassies required you to be resident or a national of the country you are applying in. So oddly, the US was far more permissive than other locales in this one aspect. All this change does is bring it in line with security practices that other nations already had in place. Honestly am quite surprised that the US didn’t already have this restriction consid…
US Visa Applications Must Be Submitted from Country of Residence or Nationality
71–80 of 152 posts
Re: US Visa Applications Must Be Submitted from Country of Residence or Nationality
#72I was a US diplomat in India for 2 years and processed tens of thousands of visas. While this change will cause some inconvenience for, e.g., current H-1B visa holders from India who can no longer travel to Canada or Mexio to apply for new visas, in general it makes a lot of sense. I worked at the number one H-1B processing post worldwide. Our post had the expertise to quickly evaluate applications and approve the cl…
Re: US Visa Applications Must Be Submitted from Country of Residence or Nationality
#73The idea that someone from Haiti could get to Nassau for a visa interview is not serious.
Re: US Visa Applications Must Be Submitted from Country of Residence or Nationality
#74Re: US Visa Applications Must Be Submitted from Country of Residence or Nationality
#75[flagged]
Hm, this comment makes me realize that there isn’t really a social consensus on whether or not AI generated content is welcome in these kinds of discussions. On one hand, I’m generally annoyed any time I see unsolicited AI generations because it’s usually garbage and I could have just asked an AI myself. But in this case I probably wasn’t going to and this comment is genuinely insightful… I guess I would have preferr…
I feel the consensus is clear. Reposting blurbs from robots is anathematic to our discourse.
Re: US Visa Applications Must Be Submitted from Country of Residence or Nationality
#76The idea that someone from Haiti could get to Nassau for a visa interview is not serious.
Re: US Visa Applications Must Be Submitted from Country of Residence or Nationality
#77Earlier quoted context omitted.
Really? Do you have any examples? I’ve had visas around the world (and encountered numerous weird requirements) but never have I been required to apply for a visa from my country of nationality. Even China, which is very restrictive, allows for non-national applications. (And in fact, in my experience, it is getting easier with online applications becoming more common.)
I have several examples and lots of personal experience. I’ve been asked to go back from Mexico, Brazil, and Chile while traveling there and applying for a visa to Peru. Finally the Peruvian embassy in Chile gave me a visa to visit Peru because I accidentally bumped into the assistant consul. https://bkpk.me/peru-visa-for-indians/ The San Francisco consulate of India refused to process my spouse’s Indian visa because…
Re: US Visa Applications Must Be Submitted from Country of Residence or Nationality
#78Earlier quoted context omitted.
I guess I am curious about this "visa shopping" problem - is it really a big deal? And if it is, how hard is it going to be for a motivated applicant to establish "proof of residence" in an arbitrary country? Are we talking about a utility bill? Is this just going to derail world travelers who want to add a last minute US leg to their itinerary? That would seem entirely pointless. Honestly I'm pretty confused.
For us in the third world it is! As an example, in my country of residence, a non-national needs to wait more than a year to even get to an interview with a US consul.
Re: US Visa Applications Must Be Submitted from Country of Residence or Nationality
#79Can anyone explain a rational political motivation behind this? I realize "less immigrants" is the hand-wavy explanation, but how does this benefit those in charge?
Immigrants don’t apply for non immigrant visas
Re: US Visa Applications Must Be Submitted from Country of Residence or Nationality
#80Earlier quoted context omitted.
Hm, this comment makes me realize that there isn’t really a social consensus on whether or not AI generated content is welcome in these kinds of discussions. On one hand, I’m generally annoyed any time I see unsolicited AI generations because it’s usually garbage and I could have just asked an AI myself. But in this case I probably wasn’t going to and this comment is genuinely insightful… I guess I would have preferr…
I also agree that this comment is likely AI generated (i.e., "why this matters" gave it away for me. I think I've seen this phrase a lot with ChatGPT). I think it is the last part of the last sentence and the toeing of the party line that bugs me, "likely aimed at improving security screening and preventing abuse of the system". It's "Manufacturing Consent"[0] à la 21st Century. [0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Manu…