Live data from Hacker News

Show HN: I recreated Windows XP as my portfolio

mitchivin.com

201–210 of 340 posts

Re: Show HN: I recreated Windows XP as my portfolio

#201

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I think of this as a homage or appropriation, a gentle upgrade of classic Windows XP aesthetic into a form that merges a few contemporary affordances and new polish. It's a classic way of keeping art and styles fresh and how aesthetics evolve while retaining a clear lineage that respects their roots.

this ^ while also completely disregarding portfolio conventions. some have even said "If i was a recruiter I would instantly click off because it takes too long to load" hahah

If you're still working on this, you can add a "Pedantry mode" ou "Really faithful" switch that turns some of the suggestions on. It could work as a way to show that you're really aware of the shortcomings of the first implementation without messing too much with what you've got already done. And it can also work as a way to show some kind of "appreciation" for the feedback you're getting here..

Personally, I've used XP a lot back in the day, but don't remember much of the details like most users are reporting here, so I really liked to play with your website, and would definitely hire you if I was in such position.

Good luck!

Re: Show HN: I recreated Windows XP as my portfolio

#202
post #199

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Windows (or anything) is nice when its fast. Most things should work in under 20ms so I don't notice a delay.

20ms is faster than a fly reaction time, it's about the same time which 60HZ monitor takes to refresh the frame, 10 times faster than a typical human's reaction. Everything under 150 ms is pretty much indistinguishably fast to a normal person.

If this were true, then a 10fps movie clip would be indistinguishable from a 24fps or a 60fps one. I have written several years ago about how optimizing my shell prompt from 50ms to 5ms was definitely a noticeable impact on how snappy the shell felt: https://xyrillian.de/thoughts/posts/latency-matters.html

Re: Show HN: I recreated Windows XP as my portfolio

#203
post #21

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Did you make this all by yourself?

yeah, its been my obsession for the past 6 months. Im a junior graphic designer so I decided I would try something out of the box to try and grab recruiters attention, since my actual projects wouldn't be enough

Super impressive!

Re: Show HN: I recreated Windows XP as my portfolio

#204
We are learning. The thing about open access and giving access to those codes is so the knowledge is there, anyone can do it, use it for a reason, and hopefully they generate rewards for improvements people that are much better at coding than I will be able to fix and add on it never goes stale in 100 years the improvements are made .

Re: Show HN: I recreated Windows XP as my portfolio

#205
post #199

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Windows (or anything) is nice when its fast. Most things should work in under 20ms so I don't notice a delay.

20ms is faster than a fly reaction time, it's about the same time which 60HZ monitor takes to refresh the frame, 10 times faster than a typical human's reaction. Everything under 150 ms is pretty much indistinguishably fast to a normal person.

You're wrong. You can clearly see a difference between 20ms reaction time (as instantaneous as it gets because of what you say, 1/60 = 16.6666...), whereas 150 ms is a fast reaction but it definitely is a noticeable lag. I wish your opinion didn't exist because how can we expect to get rid of the lag everywhere if some people even claim it doesn't matter.

Re: Show HN: I recreated Windows XP as my portfolio

#206
post #199

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Windows (or anything) is nice when its fast. Most things should work in under 20ms so I don't notice a delay.

20ms is faster than a fly reaction time, it's about the same time which 60HZ monitor takes to refresh the frame, 10 times faster than a typical human's reaction. Everything under 150 ms is pretty much indistinguishably fast to a normal person.

"Faster than a humans reaction" time is different from "indistinguishable".
Post reply on HN