Live data from Hacker News

Why Everybody Is Losing Money On AI

wheresyoured.at

1–10 of 117 posts

Re: Why Everybody Is Losing Money On AI

#2
This is a really well written article and contains references to back up the claims made. This part was mind blowing though:

> Cursor sends 100% of their revenue to Anthropic, who then takes that money and puts it into building out Claude Code, a competitor to Cursor. Cursor is Anthropic's largest customer. Cursor is deeply unprofitable, and was that way even before Anthropic chose to add "Service Tiers," jacking up the prices for enterprise apps like Cursor.

Re: Why Everybody Is Losing Money On AI

#3
> total revenue: $4B > compute for training models: -$3B > compute for running models: -$2B > employee salaries: -$700M

Though not really representative of what users of said models may experience financially, at this point the question should be raised: if AI compute is 7x more expensive than developer salaries, what's the point? I thought the whole idea was to save money on human resources...

Re: Why Everybody Is Losing Money On AI

#9
I'm not making any claims as to whether AI will become profitable or when, but if there's a new tech that has high potential or is highly desirable, I think it's expected that initially money will be lost.

Simply because strategically if there's high long term potential, it initially makes sense to put more money in than you get out of.

Not saying that AI is this, but if you determined that you have a golden goose that laid out 10 trillion USD worth of eggs when it got 10 years old, how much would you pay for it in the auction, and what would you have to show for it for the initial 9 years?

Now what if the golden goose scaled to 10 trillion each year linearly? First years people sound of mind would overpay for what it makes.

Re: Why Everybody Is Losing Money On AI

#10
post #3

> total revenue: $4B > compute for training models: -$3B > compute for running models: -$2B > employee salaries: -$700M Though not really representative of what users of said models may experience financially, at this point the question should be raised: if AI compute is 7x more expensive than developer salaries, what's the point? I thought the whole idea was to save money on human resources...

Someday (probably), a model will be trained once that is better than a human at coding, and it will only need trained once.

It can then be used indefinitely for the cost of inference, which is cheap and will continue getting cheaper.

Post reply on HN