Live data from Hacker News

Claude Code: Now in Beta in Zed

zed.dev

231–240 of 431 posts

Re: Claude Code: Now in Beta in Zed

#231

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Your comment is as insulting as it is indicative of a complete lack of knowledge about the world of editors and software development in general.

If you think "build by atom team" and "not electron" are any kind of serious advantage for any peace of software than your are the one who lacks knowledge about software development.

Made me think about: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43041923 where they mention Atom as well

Re: Claude Code: Now in Beta in Zed

#232
post #162

I love Zed and I'm glad you now have native support for Claude. I previously ran it using the instructions in this post: https://benswift.me/blog/2025/07/23/running-claude-code-with... One thing that still suffers is AI autocomplete. While I tried Zed's own solution and supermaven (now part of Cursor), I still find Cursor's AI autocomplete and predictions much more accurate (even pulling up a file via search is more…

What Zed lacks in code generation quality it makes up for in not-being-an-Electron-app

and then loses by not having plugin support

Re: Claude Code: Now in Beta in Zed

#233
post #126

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Seems like a reasonable trade-off to me. I'm happy for them to have a sustainable business model and people seem quite willing to pay monthly for AI. As long as they keep the free version and the ability to disable AI features then I think everyone wins.

> As long as they keep... The thing is, they will have to switch to maximizing monetization (or die trying). Those investors are ultimately in control, and while they are happy to gain market share for now, that's what they will demand in the future. They will keep a free version for as long as it's working for them, but you will be monetized, one way or another, sooner or later, and you might not enjoy it.

We brought this upon ourselves. As much as we reviled forking over four hundred 1998-dollars to use Microsoft Word, shrink-wrapped closed-source was more honest way to make a living than the current surveillance schemes.

Re: Claude Code: Now in Beta in Zed

#234
post #193

I love Zed and I'm glad you now have native support for Claude. I previously ran it using the instructions in this post: https://benswift.me/blog/2025/07/23/running-claude-code-with... One thing that still suffers is AI autocomplete. While I tried Zed's own solution and supermaven (now part of Cursor), I still find Cursor's AI autocomplete and predictions much more accurate (even pulling up a file via search is more…

I was somewhat surprised to find that Zed still doesn't have a way to add your own local autocomplete AI using something like Ollama. Something like Qwen 2.5 coder at a tiny 1.5b parameters will work just fine for the stuff that I want. It runs fast and works when I'm between internet connections too. I'd also like to see a company like Zed allow me to buy a license of their autocomplete AI model to run locally rathe…

Ditto, that was one of the dealbreakers for me using Zed, the Copilot integration is miles behind Cursor's

Re: Claude Code: Now in Beta in Zed

#235
post #162

Earlier quoted context omitted.

What Zed lacks in code generation quality it makes up for in not-being-an-Electron-app

and then loses by not having plugin support

It does have extensions, but they are much more limited. In particular they can't define UI elements inside buffers, so you can't replicate something with rich UI like the Git integration in an extension.

Re: Claude Code: Now in Beta in Zed

#238
post #162

Earlier quoted context omitted.

What Zed lacks in code generation quality it makes up for in not-being-an-Electron-app

Zed includes node.js runtime and 100s of megabytes of javascript. It is essentially Electron.

Complete nonsense.

https://zed.dev/blog/videogame https://zed.dev/blog/we-have-to-start-over

Re: Claude Code: Now in Beta in Zed

#239
post #210
post #176

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The other examples you listed are valid, but A.I tab auto complete is a model & inference issue unrelated to the editor.

It is a feature that they control. Whether it comes from the model, a bad prompt, a bad provider or a bug in their implementation is their responsibility (especially considering you have to pay per-request AI features).

That’s true if we’re evaluating Zed as a product, but the GP is discussing Zed U.I perf specifically.
Post reply on HN