Live data from Hacker News

Parallel AI agents are a game changer

morningcoffee.io

81–88 of 88 posts

Re: Parallel AI agents are a game changer

#81
post #26

Earlier quoted context omitted.

>This is just software engineering?!? Absolutely. The existence of vibe coding does not mean production code is going to be engineered without the same principles we've always used - even if we're using AI to generate a lot more code than before. Any crowd suggesting that this was not the case has lost the plot, imo.

People find it a lot more palatable when the AI requires all this information than when software engineers do though. If I ask for clear requirements I’m asked to just figure it out. But if the AI implements nonsense without clear requirements that the fault of the specs.

I consider it my job to figure out the requirements. The fact that they aren't specified in detail allows me to do what I think is best rather than being bound by often arbitrary specifications.

I judge which decisions I make and which ones I bring up to my team/PO/whatever. Most of the time I just do what I think is best, some times I'll do something and then bring it up later like "I did this this way but if that doesn't work I can change it", typically for things that will be easy to change later. Some things I ask about before I do them because they won't be easy to change later.

I'll often take technical liberties with frontend designs, for example I'll use a html select rather than reinventing the drop-down just to be able to put rounded corners on the options. I'll style scrollbars using the very limited options css provides rather than reinvent scrollbars just to follow the design exactly. Most of the time nobody cares, we can always go back later and do these types of things if we really want a certain aesthetic.

I have never had the impression that my questions bother people, rather the opposite. I've had multiple designers say they appreciate the way I interact with them, I respect their work and their designs but I ask them if something looks like an oversight or I'm not exactly sure what their intention is. POs and such are always happy to answer simple questions, I make it easy for them: here's a decision we need to make, I want you to make it. Maybe I have a suggestion for what I would prefer and some reasons why I prefer that solution.

I don't expect them to think of everything and answer all my potential questions in advance, that's just unnecessary and difficult work.

Re: Parallel AI agents are a game changer

#82
post #71

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I’m not ok with someone self promoting here at the cost of thousands of people thinking they’re either not smart enough, or are doing something incorrectly. We saw this same pattern during the dot com boom a quarter century ago with self promoters creating a “you just don’t get it” culture which eventually collapsed like a house of cards. What we share should be reproducible by others and we should avoid hand wavey e…

Technology evolves. At some point there's going to be things that other people are doing that you can't replicate yet. That doesn't mean you're not smart enough. But it might mean that you are doing something wrong. Often though, you just got to try different things or wait for methodologies to consolidate and become mainstream. Even if parallel agents is not something easily done currently, debating about ways to do…

[dead]

Re: Parallel AI agents are a game changer

#83

Obviously I'm an AI-tools skeptic, but this is hilarious: > 1. Prepare issues with sufficient context > Start by ensuring each GitHub issue contains enough context for agents to understand what needs to be built and how it integrates with the system. This might include details about feature behavior, file locations, database structure, or specific requirements such as displaying certain fields or handling edge cases.…

I tend to agree with English being the new programming language. Those with English communication struggles will struggle to code this way.

Re: Parallel AI agents are a game changer

#84
post #50

The author is lying. My team and I are heavy users of Claude code and other agents and it ain’t like this. You need to manage an AI coding agent carefully and course correct frequently. There are cases for parallel agents but they are tasks like parallel document fetches and summarization, and other tasks that don’t require supervision. The idea of having multiple parallel agents merge pull requests or resolve issues…

Your comment is disproportionately rude. Just because your team can't leverage multiple coding agents doesn't mean no one else can. And even if OP also can't, this is a good place to discuss possible problems and solutions for parallel development using coding agents. Please refrain from gatekeeping.

No. Unfortunately there’s a problem now of people blatantly lying about the ability of LLMs to get attention. And it’s extremely effective.

I say this as someone who uses them every day for programming and is also excited now and for the future possibilities. The just blatant lying needs to stop though and needs to be called out.

Re: Parallel AI agents are a game changer

#86
post #78
post #17

Earlier quoted context omitted.

https://youtu.be/xAKVi_jvvg4 Two hours of Web Dev Cody.

Wow, I didnt expect that dystopias can be so boring. If somebody like that producing code of like that low quality worked with me, I can see myself spilling coffee or acid on them or their laptop.

Assaulting underperforming devs is one way to ensure code quality, I guess.

Re: Parallel AI agents are a game changer

#88
post #78

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Wow, I didnt expect that dystopias can be so boring. If somebody like that producing code of like that low quality worked with me, I can see myself spilling coffee or acid on them or their laptop.

Assaulting underperforming devs is one way to ensure code quality, I guess.

Keep in mind that in their mind they are performing very well as they (or rather Claude) are churning PR after PR.

We gotta stop the endless characters production at least for a bit so we and the git servers get some time to breathe free from slop. A tactical coffee spill is a small price to pay.

Post reply on HN