Live data from Hacker News

Google Pixel 10 series review

arstechnica.com

11–20 of 111 posts

Re: Google Pixel 10 series review

#13
post #7
post #4

Google is really losing the plot lately, like worse than ever before. The changes to sideloading android apps is perhaps the biggest red flag they've ever thrown. But the new UI updates look largely silly and unhelpful, but maybe I'm being unfair.

If you are calling 'installing an app on your own phone without involvement of the vendor' 'sideloading' then you are complicit.

I like this point very much.

That the term "sideloading" has normalized treating this as a special case is a problem.

It's unlikely the terminology can be rolled back at this point, but occasionally reflecting on this is useful.

Re: Google Pixel 10 series review

#14
post #7
post #4

Google is really losing the plot lately, like worse than ever before. The changes to sideloading android apps is perhaps the biggest red flag they've ever thrown. But the new UI updates look largely silly and unhelpful, but maybe I'm being unfair.

If you are calling 'installing an app on your own phone without involvement of the vendor' 'sideloading' then you are complicit.

Semantic wars are unhelpful distractions. Focus on the issues.

Re: Google Pixel 10 series review

#15
post #9
post #3

My older Pixel got the UI updates and I hate them. The look is inelegant, even childish, and like Apple they've decided to hide things under extra button presses. The insistence on adding AI just makes startup slower. I have not had a single use for AI on my phone ever, though I'm a big fan of it for software dev.

The AI tax is crazy, Pixels now reserve 3.5GB of RAM to keep Googles local models permanently loaded regardless of how much you use them, or whether you use them at all. The base Pixel 10 has 12GB of RAM so that's nearly a third set aside for something you may never use! Last year they had the relative sense to only enable that "feature" on the higher end SKUs with 16GB of RAM, while the lower end SKUs with 12GB woul…

That is wild. And so disrespectful of apps that may need that extra memory. I wonder if GrapheneOS will also suffer this memory overhead, once they do support this newest Android. Or possibly allow disabling it.

Re: Google Pixel 10 series review

#16
The thing that annoys me the most about this device, if true, is their handling of the Pixel 10 battery. They keep cutting corners. After my 4a and 6a batteries got nerfed, you would think Google might have learned something.

https://www.androidauthority.com/google-pixel-10-battery-hea...

I like the swipe at "post truth cameras" and would prefer AI be limited to suggestions, etc, not so baked into the processing pipeline.

Re: Google Pixel 10 series review

#17
I'm still "clinging" to my Pixel 6 Pro. I have an unboxed pixel 8 pro from 2 years ago. My corporate contract subsidizes a new phone every two years from the time of contract renewal.

I really think the phone update cycle needs to be lengthened, and that updates are so slightly incremental.

I would like to dip my toes into the fold phone pond, but that seems excessive. In November, Vodafone will call me and ask me which phone I want. It all seems ridiculous. I haven't noticed a difference in photo quality nor performance for years now have I felt the need to upgrade to the two-generations-later sitting in a drawer just meters way from me.

The only comment/complaint I have about newer software updates is the f*king voice which kicked in while taking a photo. "One pet cropped, move phone slightly down".

Re: Google Pixel 10 series review

#18
post #7

Earlier quoted context omitted.

If you are calling 'installing an app on your own phone without involvement of the vendor' 'sideloading' then you are complicit.

Semantic wars are unhelpful distractions. Focus on the issues.

No, he's right. The general public has no idea what "sideloading" even means, but they sure as shit would want to be able to load their own apps if they were asked about it. The terminology is meant to obfuscate the issue.

Re: Google Pixel 10 series review

#19
post #17

I'm still "clinging" to my Pixel 6 Pro. I have an unboxed pixel 8 pro from 2 years ago. My corporate contract subsidizes a new phone every two years from the time of contract renewal. I really think the phone update cycle needs to be lengthened, and that updates are so slightly incremental. I would like to dip my toes into the fold phone pond, but that seems excessive. In November, Vodafone will call me and ask me wh…

Why would you not sell the unused phone instead of it sitting in a box depreciating?

Re: Google Pixel 10 series review

#20
Why in the world I would buy a phone (any not just Google) that costs north of $800 is beyond me unless I want to signal my purchasing power. If utility is my metric and not outward signalling and flex, I find this worst deployment of my funds.

So called "budget" phones these days have OLED screens some even come with 120Hz displays (beyond me why someone would want that) and plenty of compute and memory.

You want camera, buy a camera. You want gaming, buy a console or gaming machine.

Post reply on HN