Earlier quoted context omitted.
I don’t necessarily see a problem with enabling like talented groups to be mingled together, that said it depends on the metrics. A friend who had a 3.2 in HS did way better in life than several 4.0+ students. The other end of the spectrum is the way most of the US handles high school. Long gone are gifted and talented programs before high school and in many cases, for instance those with an ability for math are stuc…
The issue with "gifted only schools" is they end up eating the bulk of funds and legitimately don't have a strong predictive capacity on student success that couldn't already be explained the parental background and early childhood care. In my case, I never placed in gifted academic programs in elementary and middle, but by HS was able to take 14 AP classes (and auto shop - always liked tinkering since elementary sch…
Sadly education has evolved where schools teach to the norm rather than acknowledging people have different strengths and weaknesses.
It does not require separate schools, it needs funding and more importantly, someone good at math needs to be able to work with others good at math.
The educational curriculum in the US for grade school has been standardized to the mediocre and any attempt to encourage gifted is considered a problem.