> We're sorry, but something went wrong. Iceweasel 15 (rebadged Firefox) on Linux.
Show HN: We got tired of asking 'What browser are you using?' and created this
171–180 of 183 posts
Re: Show HN: We got tired of asking 'What browser are you using?' and created this
#172We are working on adding more browser icons. Thank you for your patience
Re: Show HN: We got tired of asking 'What browser are you using?' and created this
#173Earlier quoted context omitted.
Oops :( Can you please pass on the url string you got? (That has all your info)
Lynx 2.8.6rel.4: https://aboutmybrowser.com/1283428590 Lynx 2.8.8dev.2: https://aboutmybrowser.com/4027520259 Links 2.1pre32: https://aboutmybrowser.com/3138479085 ELinks 0.11.1: https://aboutmybrowser.com/3604611808 (Text-based browsers deserve love, too.)
Re: Show HN: We got tired of asking 'What browser are you using?' and created this
#174works nicely for me in firefox/opera, but doesn't do too well in anything else... although I'd doubt you'd need to worry about them too much, still, it's always nice to see apps like this fail gracefully, if you had a 'this particular browser isn't supported' type message rather than 'something went wrong' http://imgur.com/a/chkc2 broken useragents.. konqueror: Mozilla/5.0 (compatible; Konqueror/4.6; Linux) KHTML/4.6…
Re: Show HN: We got tired of asking 'What browser are you using?' and created this
#175Wow, talk about synchronicity... I put up our site doing the exact same thing last night ! Design-wise you're definitely ahead, however. :-) Our version is at http://www.browser-details.com . When you sign up you get your own subdomain - or you define a CNAME under your own domain [premium]. You can upload your logo, define a list of recipients, and your clients can send the browser details directly to one of those r…
Your design is definitely way better in my opinion; much easier to focus in on any specific information immediately (and with no scrolling required). The only significant usability change I'd make to both sites would be have the one who wants to know the details send a link to a setter URL of a known key (e.g. '/set/foo') which would both display the information to the user and send the information to the server so t…
Using this link makes "Send details" pop up immediately on opening. All the receiver has to do is click "Send".
Re: Show HN: We got tired of asking 'What browser are you using?' and created this
#176Re: Show HN: We got tired of asking 'What browser are you using?' and created this
#177Wow, talk about synchronicity... I put up our site doing the exact same thing last night ! Design-wise you're definitely ahead, however. :-) Our version is at http://www.browser-details.com . When you sign up you get your own subdomain - or you define a CNAME under your own domain [premium]. You can upload your logo, define a list of recipients, and your clients can send the browser details directly to one of those r…
Your site at least works. aboutmybrowser.com failed with two of my devices with a generic message. Your site works perfectly. Well done!
Re: Show HN: We got tired of asking 'What browser are you using?' and created this
#178Earlier quoted context omitted.
> No need to copy all the text or enter your email to share the info. // So a support provider has to send the user to your site. The user then has to copy the URL, paste it in to a message, lookup the person making the request for the details and forward them. The requester has to then go to your site and enter the URL in order to retrieve the details. Compared with the support supplier sending an email with a link…
Most of my tech support requests come in via email anyway. I send them to supportdetails.com, and they're very happy to send me an email. We have a tech-savvy userbase, so usually they say they liked it so much they'll use it themselves.
Re: Show HN: We got tired of asking 'What browser are you using?' and created this
#179Earlier quoted context omitted.
Your design is definitely superior from a usability standpoint. Mad props to the OP for a nice site (though the reports of inaccurate reporting is alarming) but tomorrow I will be going your link to my phone girl. An example is the OP's large logo icon in the center of the page (serves little to no purpose) and the requirement to scroll the page to find extra info. Good on you man! Edit: suggestion - allow the subdom…
Thanks for the kind words and sorry to the OP for hijacking this thread. I was really just floored by the coincidence... Great suggestion, by the way! I added this feature so now adding "www." will go to the subdomain as well.
No worries. No contest here :) Love seeing how others approach the same problem