> The paper also noted that although reading with children is rare, it has not changed much over time. This part really got to me, reading to one's children is rare? That's so sad. My toddler loves reading with me.
Reading for pleasure plummets by 40% in the US
41–50 of 85 posts
Re: Reading for pleasure plummets by 40% in the US
#42Re: Reading for pleasure plummets by 40% in the US
#43Question: How much is this impacted by people who read for pleasure but fool themselves into thinking it's useful? Many books are closer to edutainment than practical applicable advice. To a certain type of person these are easier to read (spend time on) than reading purely fiction. And even then it's easy to say you only read fiction that is totally giving you something more insightful than entertainment. See also m…
Re: Reading for pleasure plummets by 40% in the US
#44Maybe I am misunderstanding the study but I don’t understand why reading a magazine or newspaper is counted while reading an article on one’s phone is not.
Further, reading on tablets, computers, or smartphones was not explicitly included in examples, making it unclear whether this behavior would have been classified as reading for personal interest or technology use.Re: Reading for pleasure plummets by 40% in the US
#45Re: Reading for pleasure plummets by 40% in the US
#46 Further, reading on tablets, computers, or smartphones was not explicitly included in examples, making it unclear whether this behavior would have been classified as reading for personal interest or technology use.
I would like to cast doubt on the findings if they don't include phones.Re: Reading for pleasure plummets by 40% in the US
#47> The paper also noted that although reading with children is rare, it has not changed much over time. This part really got to me, reading to one's children is rare? That's so sad. My toddler loves reading with me.
It jumped out at me too. Are people not reading to their kids?!
Re: Reading for pleasure plummets by 40% in the US
#48Maybe I am misunderstanding the study but I don’t understand why reading a magazine or newspaper is counted while reading an article on one’s phone is not.
Quote: The study focused on two activities: reading for pleasure (reading a book, newspaper, magazine, reading on electronic devices and listening to audiobooks) and reading with children.
Re: Reading for pleasure plummets by 40% in the US
#49Maybe I am misunderstanding the study but I don’t understand why reading a magazine or newspaper is counted while reading an article on one’s phone is not.
I think more interesting is reading a book on a phone doesn't seem to count, which his the main way I read. Further, reading on tablets, computers, or smartphones was not explicitly included in examples, making it unclear whether this behavior would have been classified as reading for personal interest or technology use.
Re: Reading for pleasure plummets by 40% in the US
#50Further, reading on tablets, computers, or smartphones was not explicitly included in examples, making it unclear whether this behavior would have been classified as reading for personal interest or technology use. I would like to cast doubt on the findings if they don't include phones.