Live data from Hacker News

AI crawlers, fetchers are blowing up websites; Meta, OpenAI are worst offenders

theregister.com

71–80 of 148 posts

Re: AI crawlers, fetchers are blowing up websites; Meta, OpenAI are worst offenders

#71
post #54
post #49

Place alongside https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44962529 "Why are anime catgirls blocking my access to the Linux kernel?". This is why. AI is going to damage society not in fancy sci-fi ways but by centralizing profit made at the expense of everyone else on the internet, who is then forced to erect boundaries to protect themselves, worsening the experience for the rest of the public. Who also have to pay higher…

I'm far from being an AI enthusiast as anyone can be, but this issue has nothing to do with AI specifically. It's just that some greedy companies are writing incredibly shitty crawlers that don't follow any of the enstablished conventions (respecting robots.txt, using a proper UA string, rate limiting, whatever). This situation could have easily happened earlier than the AI boom, for different reasons.

Obaying robots.txt can not be enforced. Even if one country makes laws about it, another one will have 0 fucks to give.

Re: AI crawlers, fetchers are blowing up websites; Meta, OpenAI are worst offenders

#75
post #34

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The second I get hit with bot traffic that makes my server heat up, I would just slam some aggressive anti bot stuff infront. Then you, my friend, are getting nothing with your fancy AI agent.

so the fancy AI agent will have to get really fancy and mimic human traffic and all is good until the server heats up from all those separate human trafficionados - then what?

Nobody is forcing anyone to share their knowledge. What then? Dead internet.

Re: AI crawlers, fetchers are blowing up websites; Meta, OpenAI are worst offenders

#76
Why is this not a violation of the CFAA, and why aren't SWEs and directors going to prison over it?

As long as I have an EULA or a robots.txt or even a banner that forbids this sort of access, shouldn't any computerized access be considered abuse? Something, something, scraping JSTOR?

Re: AI crawlers, fetchers are blowing up websites; Meta, OpenAI are worst offenders

#77
post #34

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The second I get hit with bot traffic that makes my server heat up, I would just slam some aggressive anti bot stuff infront. Then you, my friend, are getting nothing with your fancy AI agent.

so the fancy AI agent will have to get really fancy and mimic human traffic and all is good until the server heats up from all those separate human trafficionados - then what?

The end of the open web. That's what.

Sites will have to either shutdown or move behind a protection racket run by one of the evil megacorps. And TBH, shutting down is the better option.

With clickthru traffic dead, whats even the point of putting anything online? To feed AIs so that someone else can profit at my (very literal) expense? No thanks. The knowledge dies with me.

The internet dark age is here. Everyone, retreat to your fiefdom.

Re: AI crawlers, fetchers are blowing up websites; Meta, OpenAI are worst offenders

#78

My worst offender for scraping one of my sites was Anthropic. I deployed an ai tar pit ( https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42725147 ) to see what it would do it with it, and Anthropic's crawler kept scraping it for weeks. I calculated the logs and I think I wasted nearly a year of their time in total, because they were crawling in parallel. Other scrapers weren't so persistent.

For me it was OpenAI. GTPBot hammered my honeypot with 0.87 requests per second for about 5 weeks. Other crawlers only made up 2% of the traffic. 1.8 million requests, 4 GiB of traffic. Then it just abruptly stopped for whatever reason.

Re: AI crawlers, fetchers are blowing up websites; Meta, OpenAI are worst offenders

#79
post #24

They mention anubis, cloudflare, robots.txt – does anyone have experiences with how much any of them help?

robots.txt is obviously only effective against well-behaved bots. OpenAI etc are usually well behaved, but there's at least one large network of rogue scraping bots that ignores robots.txt, fakes the user-agent (usually to some old Chrome version) and cycles through millions of different residential proxy IPs. On my own sites, this network is by far the worst offender and the "well-behaved" bots like OpenAI are barel…

Surely there are solutions more subtle than blocking 80% of the world population...

Re: AI crawlers, fetchers are blowing up websites; Meta, OpenAI are worst offenders

#80
post #54

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I'm far from being an AI enthusiast as anyone can be, but this issue has nothing to do with AI specifically. It's just that some greedy companies are writing incredibly shitty crawlers that don't follow any of the enstablished conventions (respecting robots.txt, using a proper UA string, rate limiting, whatever). This situation could have easily happened earlier than the AI boom, for different reasons.

Obaying robots.txt can not be enforced. Even if one country makes laws about it, another one will have 0 fucks to give.

It was never intended to be "enforced":

> The standard, developed in 1994, relies on voluntary compliance [0]

It was conceived in a world with an expectation of collectively respectful behaviour: specifically that search crawlers could swamp "average Joe's" site but shouldn't.

We're in a different world now but companies still have a choice. Some do still respect it... and then there's Meta, OpenAI and such. Communities only work when people are willing to respect community rules, not have compliance imposed on them.

It then becomes an arms race: a reasonable response from average Joe is "well, OK, I'll allows anyone but [Meta|OpenAI|...] to access my site. Fine in theory, dificult in practice:

1. Block IP addresses for the offending bots --> bots run from obfuscated addresses

2. Block the bot user agent --> bots lie about UA.

...and so on.

[0]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robots.txt

Post reply on HN