Live data from Hacker News

Mark Zuckerberg freezes AI hiring amid bubble fears

telegraph.co.uk

191–200 of 936 posts

Re: Mark Zuckerberg freezes AI hiring amid bubble fears

#191
It almost seems as though the record-setting bonuses they were dolling out to hire the top minds in AI might have been a little shortsighted.

A couple of years ago, I asked a financial investment person about AI as a trick question. She did well by recommending investing in companies that invest in AI (like MS) but who had other profitable businesses (like Azure). I was waiting for her to put her foot in her mouth and buy into the hype.She skillfully navigated the question in a way that won my respect.

I personally believe that a lot of investment money is going to evaporate before the market resets. What we're calling AI will continue to have certain uses, but investors will realize that the moonshot being promised is undeliverable and a lot of jobs will disappear. This will hurt the wider industry, and the economy by extension.

Re: Mark Zuckerberg freezes AI hiring amid bubble fears

#192

LLMs are not the way to AGI and it's becoming clearer to even the most fanatic evangelists. It's not without reason GPT-5 was only a minor incremental update. I am convinced we have reached peak LLM. There's no way a system of statistical predictions by itself can ever develop anything close to reasoning or intelligence. I think maybe there might be some potential there if we combined LLMs with formal reasoning syste…

[deleted]

Re: Mark Zuckerberg freezes AI hiring amid bubble fears

#196

>> Mr Zuckerberg has said he wants to develop a “personal superintelligence” that acts as a permanent superhuman assistant and lives in smart glasses. Yann Le Cun has spoken about this, so much that I thought it was his idea. In any case, how's that going to work? Is everyone going to start wearing glasses? What happens if someone doesn't want to wear glasses?

I don't want to come across as a shill, but I think superintelligence is being used here because the end result is murky and ill-defined at this point.

I think the concept is like: "a tool that has the utility of a 'personal assistant' so much so that you wouldn't have to hire one of those." (Not so much that the "superintelligence" will mimicry a human personal assistant).

Obviously this is just a guess though

Re: Mark Zuckerberg freezes AI hiring amid bubble fears

#197

>> Mr Zuckerberg has said he wants to develop a “personal superintelligence” that acts as a permanent superhuman assistant and lives in smart glasses. Yann Le Cun has spoken about this, so much that I thought it was his idea. In any case, how's that going to work? Is everyone going to start wearing glasses? What happens if someone doesn't want to wear glasses?

“ In any case, how's that going to work? Is everyone going to start wearing glasses? What happens if someone doesn't want to wear glasses?” People probably said the same thing about “what if someone doesn’t want to carry a phone with them everywhere”. If it’s useful enough the culture will change (which, I unequivocally think they won’t be, but I digress)

"grills" are going to come back in a big way

Re: Mark Zuckerberg freezes AI hiring amid bubble fears

#198

I really do wonder if any of those rock star $100m++ hires managed to get a 9-figure sign-on bonus, or if the majority have year(s) long performance clauses. Imagine being paid generational wealth, and then the house of cards comes crashing down a couple of months later.

I've heard of high 7-figure salaries but no 9 figure salaries. Source for this?

Re: Mark Zuckerberg freezes AI hiring amid bubble fears

#200
post #194

BTW: Meta specially denies that the reason is bubble fears and they provide alternate explanation in the article. Better title: Meta freezes AI hiring due to some basic organizational reasons.

A hiring freeze is not something you do because you are planning well.
Post reply on HN