Live data from Hacker News

Databricks is raising a Series K Investment at >$100B valuation

databricks.com

121–130 of 214 posts

Re: Databricks is raising a Series K Investment at >$100B valuation

#121
post #90

It will be a nice discount acquihire for Microsoft in a few years.

Databricks on azure is huge. I've heard that in some Azure regions, over 70% of the compute usage is just Databricks. So there is definitely an incentive for MS to acquire them.

so, azure growth is circular. VC funding for openai and databricks funeled into azure for growth. What happens when things get into reverse gear ?

Re: Databricks is raising a Series K Investment at >$100B valuation

#123

How is this company worth even 1% of that? Their product looks like basic wrappers for managing postgres instances and dashboards. Why would anyone with even minimal technical expertise pay for a generic service like that?

A lot of people purchasing their products have a vague understanding of the problem they're trying to solve and an even worse grasp of how dbx solves it for them. I'm living this first hand.

Re: Databricks is raising a Series K Investment at >$100B valuation

#124
post #81

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I don't think there is anything out there that really bundles everything exactly like databricks does. There are better storage solutions, better compute and better AI/ML platforms, but once you start with databricks, you dig yourself a hole because the replacing it is hard because it has such a specific subset of features across multiple domains. In our multinational environment, we have a few companies that are on…

Thanks for this. Lots to look into. Maybe I wasn't super clear. Wasn't looking for a 1:1 replacement. Trying to understand what other options are out there for small teams / projects that don't need all those enterprise features that Databricks offers (governance etc).

[deleted]

Re: Databricks is raising a Series K Investment at >$100B valuation

#126

I’ve never seen a Series K before. I wonder how their cap table looks like.

If you Google "Series K investment" basically all the hits are about this. Same applies for J and I - you have to get back to H before you start seeing anyone else.

Re: Databricks is raising a Series K Investment at >$100B valuation

#127
post #114

Earlier quoted context omitted.

PE ratio of 40 isn't bad is this market actually. Mature companies like Google/Meta are hovering around 30.

that is earnings (net income) not revenue (top line) so these are wildly different and incomparable numbers

Got it - thanks for the correction.

Re: Databricks is raising a Series K Investment at >$100B valuation

#128
post #27

Regardless of the product and idea they had, a company that is 15 years old and raised 10+ billion dollars still needing to raise money after all this time is ridiculous. Not being sustainable after all this time and billions of dollars is a sign company is just burning money, and a lot of it. wework vibes.

Do we know that they need to raise and are not sustainable? I don't think them raising is evidence of either.

Why would they raise money if they do not need? Raising money dilutes existing shareholders - who are probably not too happy about it.

Re: Databricks is raising a Series K Investment at >$100B valuation

#129

How is this company worth even 1% of that? Their product looks like basic wrappers for managing postgres instances and dashboards. Why would anyone with even minimal technical expertise pay for a generic service like that?

A company that does $4B in revenue at nice margins should be worth more than $1B.

Re: Databricks is raising a Series K Investment at >$100B valuation

#130
My little Databricks story: we setup hosted model inference for an in-house model. Worked great for several months!

But then they did maintenance and broke the entire feature. Reconfiguring everything from scratch didn't work. A key part where a Docker image is selected was replaced with a hard-coded value including a long system path (and employee name -- verified via LinkedIn).

Because of constant turn-over in account reps we couldn't get any help there. General support was of no use. We finally got acknowledgement of the issue when we got yet another new account rep, but all they did was push us towards paid support.

We exhaustively investigated the issue and it was clearly the case that nothing could be done on our end to resolve it. The entire underlying compute layer was busted.

Eventually they released a newer version of the feature which did work again, but at this point it has become impossible to justify the cost of the platform and we're 100% off.

Good luck to them, but from my experience the business fundamentals are misaligned and it's not a company I hope to ever work with again.

Post reply on HN