Live data from Hacker News

OpenMower – An open source lawn mower

github.com

1–10 of 200 posts

Re: OpenMower – An open source lawn mower

#4
> Open Source

The CC-NC-SA-4.0 license isn't an Open Source Definition compliant license, since it discriminates against a field of use (commercial applications).

https://github.com/ClemensElflein/OpenMower/blob/main/LICENS... https://opensourcedefinition.org/

A reminder, open source means surrendering your monopoly over commercial exploitation:

https://drewdevault.com/2021/01/20/FOSS-is-to-surrender-your...

Re: OpenMower – An open source lawn mower

#5

My dad's solution was simple: "Mow the lawn!" directed at me.

My solution has been even simpler --- I just use a reel mower (on an admittedly small lawn, ~1/3rd of an acre) --- it's a decent workout, esp. when I strive to finish quickly.

(the one time I asked my son to cut the grass he broke the reel mower)

Re: OpenMower – An open source lawn mower

#7
Here's what robotic mowers blades look like to understand how they work - https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/676d76e61268a4...

We just got a Sunseeker X7 to do ~4 acres of grassed area but probably ~2 acres will be garden beds and roads etc

The hardware is there, it's all software now.

People talk about updates and the robot improved amazingly, comments like - "these scuffs are from pre-update"

These are Elon's updateable cars, they will get better with time. (Sunseeker is also camera not yet LiDAR)

Robotic mowers are better than humans, there are a few if's and buts, grass nerds compare the cuts on a grass blade on YouTube for instance.

With a robot you can set blade lengths for areas and be seasonal/weather orientated. The constant cuttings mean the nutrients get shredded back in.

The Chinese seem to be the best... but that might have been my price bracket.

Obviously since you can run them at night at 3am you quickly see other uses like security/wildlife auditing. Exciting times to live in.

Re: OpenMower – An open source lawn mower

#9
post #4

> Open Source The CC-NC-SA-4.0 license isn't an Open Source Definition compliant license, since it discriminates against a field of use (commercial applications). https://github.com/ClemensElflein/OpenMower/blob/main/LICENS... https://opensourcedefinition.org/ A reminder, open source means surrendering your monopoly over commercial exploitation: https://drewdevault.com/2021/01/20/FOSS-is-to-surrender-your...

It's worth noting that the project is CC-BY-NC-SA-4.0 however it comes with a notice that other licenses are available if you content them directly. So it may not be open source under the strict definition however the project is also not staunchly anti-commercial.

> Feel free to use the design in your private/educational projects, but don't try to sell the design or products based on it without getting my consent first. The idea here is to share knowledge, not to enable others to simply sell my work. Thank you for understanding.

Re: OpenMower – An open source lawn mower

#10
post #4

> Open Source The CC-NC-SA-4.0 license isn't an Open Source Definition compliant license, since it discriminates against a field of use (commercial applications). https://github.com/ClemensElflein/OpenMower/blob/main/LICENS... https://opensourcedefinition.org/ A reminder, open source means surrendering your monopoly over commercial exploitation: https://drewdevault.com/2021/01/20/FOSS-is-to-surrender-your...

It's worth noting that the project is CC-BY-NC-SA-4.0 however it comes with a notice that other licenses are available if you content them directly. So it may not be open source under the strict definition however the project is also not staunchly anti-commercial. > Feel free to use the design in your private/educational projects, but don't try to sell the design or products based on it without getting my consent fir…

It's simply not open source. It doesn't meet the definition.

It's co-opting the term to call it open source.

This has been debated and settled. What people mean by open source or free software has a well agreed upon definition, and this isn't it.

Post reply on HN