[deleted]
Launch HN: Reality Defender (YC W22) – API for Deepfake and GenAI Detection
11–20 of 70 posts
Re: Launch HN: Reality Defender (YC W22) – API for Deepfake and GenAI Detection
#12Re: Launch HN: Reality Defender (YC W22) – API for Deepfake and GenAI Detection
#13Yeah but does it actually work, though? There have been a lot of online tools claiming to be "AI detectors" and they all seem pretty unreliable. Can you talk us through what you look for, the most common failure modes and (at suitably high level) how you dealt with those?
We have been working on this problem since 2020 and have created an trained an ensemble of AI detection models working together to tell you what is real and what is fake!
Re: Launch HN: Reality Defender (YC W22) – API for Deepfake and GenAI Detection
#14so, tie content to domains. A domain vouches for content works like that content having been a webpage or email from said domain. Signed hash in metadata is backwards compatible and its easy to make browsers etc display warnings on unsigned content, content from new domains, blacklisted domains, etc.
benefit here is while we'll have more false negatives, unlike something like this tool, it does not cause real harm on false positives, which will be numerous if it wants to be better tham simply making someome accountable for media.
AI detection cannot work, will not work, and will cause more harm than it prevents. stuff like this is irresponsible and dangerous.
Re: Launch HN: Reality Defender (YC W22) – API for Deepfake and GenAI Detection
#15Won't this just become the fitness function for training future models?
Although, I always get a bad smell from that sort of logic, because it feels vaguely similar to security through obscurity in the sense that it relies on the opposition now knowing what you are doing.
Re: Launch HN: Reality Defender (YC W22) – API for Deepfake and GenAI Detection
#16Re: Launch HN: Reality Defender (YC W22) – API for Deepfake and GenAI Detection
#17Suppose that deepfake technology progressed to the point where it is still detectable by your technology, but is impossible for the naked eye. In that scenario (which many would call an eventuality), wouldn't you also be compelled to serve as an authoritative entity on the detection of deepfakes?
Imagine a future politician who is caught on video doing something scandalous, or a court case where someone is questioning the veracity of some video evidence. Are the creators of deepfake detection algorithms going to testify as expert witnesses, and how could they convince a human judge/jury that the output of their black box algorithm isn't a false positive?
Re: Launch HN: Reality Defender (YC W22) – API for Deepfake and GenAI Detection
#18Won't this just become the fitness function for training future models?
Just based on the first post, where they talk about their API a bit, it sounds like a system hosted on their machines(?). So, I assume AI trainers won’t be able to run it locally, to train off it. Although, I always get a bad smell from that sort of logic, because it feels vaguely similar to security through obscurity in the sense that it relies on the opposition now knowing what you are doing.
Re: Launch HN: Reality Defender (YC W22) – API for Deepfake and GenAI Detection
#19Earlier quoted context omitted.
Just based on the first post, where they talk about their API a bit, it sounds like a system hosted on their machines(?). So, I assume AI trainers won’t be able to run it locally, to train off it. Although, I always get a bad smell from that sort of logic, because it feels vaguely similar to security through obscurity in the sense that it relies on the opposition now knowing what you are doing.
now -> not