Live data from Hacker News

Walkie-Textie Wireless Communicator

technoblogy.com

31–40 of 130 posts

Re: Walkie-Textie Wireless Communicator

#31
post #8

Earlier quoted context omitted.

LoRa is actually pretty thirsty on receive. You’d need some scheme for synchronization if you want to reduce power consumption.

Receipt for LoRa is low power, its transmission that kills the battery

Receiving is just transmitting nothing to see how it's getting disturbed

Re: Walkie-Textie Wireless Communicator

#33
It's a real shame phones don't have something like this built in. I mean, we literally have satellite communication in every iPhone – or, depending on how you count, every LTE phone, period!

Technically, it seems like 90% of what's required is already there anyway, but due to commercial and political pressures, we'll probably never see it happen.

Re: Walkie-Textie Wireless Communicator

#34
> LoRa can reach a range of up to 3 miles (4.8 km) in urban areas, and up to 10 miles (16 km) in rural areas

In mountainous area LoRa on 868MHz band reaches over 100km. Last month we had a stratospheric balloon with a Meshtastic node attached. It established direct (albeit intermittent) connection between Warsaw and Berlin.

Re: Walkie-Textie Wireless Communicator

#35

Reminds me of what the messenger on the Cybiko was trying to be. Too bad LoRa wasn't a thing back then, it would have been more useful if it had a better range. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cybiko

I remember seeing these on some tech show here in the UK - and being in love with the idea - seemed so cool and 'archivable' for a young person to own. A few years later they were dirt cheap on ebay - new/boxed, but by then the itch had gone, but I wish now I'd bought one.

Re: Walkie-Textie Wireless Communicator

#37

It uses the slow method where you push the same key until you get the letter you want to show up? Does anybody remember T9? You push the keys for the letters you want and it figures out what you're typing from a dictionary.

Yeah I thought he was going to say it uses T9 too, but it uses an inexplicably archaic chip so there's no way you could fit a dictionary on it.

Re: Walkie-Textie Wireless Communicator

#38
post #33

It's a real shame phones don't have something like this built in. I mean, we literally have satellite communication in every iPhone – or, depending on how you count, every LTE phone, period! Technically, it seems like 90% of what's required is already there anyway, but due to commercial and political pressures, we'll probably never see it happen.

There's a lot of cool radio-related things our smartphones could do but probably never will for regulatory/political/commercial reasons like you note.

My pet idea is to make some use of longwave! You know those time signals broadcast around 60 kHz? They cover thousands of kilometres from one transmitter. At 60 kHz the wavelength is 5 kilometres long and the RF tends to diffract around objects like mountains, buildings, etc. that get in the way. Longwave tends to penetrate underground, and through Faraday cages meant for short wavelengths.

Those time signals broadcast, in effect, 1 bit per second. The receiver is dead simple electronically and requires almost no energy to run. What if we broadcast a more modern error-corrected data stream? Every device could be supplied with a receive-only stream of a few hundred bits a second of whatever. I admit it's a solution somewhat in search of a problem. Weather updates? Emergency alerts?

Post reply on HN