Live data from Hacker News

Toothpaste made with keratin may protect and repair damaged teeth: study

kcl.ac.uk

21–30 of 225 posts

Re: Toothpaste made with keratin may protect and repair damaged teeth: study

#23
post #19

[flagged]

Not really. People started having issues with teeth when we switched to farming and went from a diverse diet to a pretty poor one (grain, grain, grain).

Correlation causation etc. I'm gonna start eating whole mice. It's a nice compromise. They're velvety.

Re: Toothpaste made with keratin may protect and repair damaged teeth: study

#24

That’s very good news, but we’ll have to wait a little bit: >>> “keratin-based enamel regeneration could be made available to the public within the next two to three years.”

That's pretty unbelievably fast, actually.

Re: Toothpaste made with keratin may protect and repair damaged teeth: study

#25
post #23

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Not really. People started having issues with teeth when we switched to farming and went from a diverse diet to a pretty poor one (grain, grain, grain).

Correlation causation etc. I'm gonna start eating whole mice. It's a nice compromise. They're velvety.

You need to try chinchillas.

Re: Toothpaste made with keratin may protect and repair damaged teeth: study

#26
post #23

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Not really. People started having issues with teeth when we switched to farming and went from a diverse diet to a pretty poor one (grain, grain, grain).

Correlation causation etc. I'm gonna start eating whole mice. It's a nice compromise. They're velvety.

Are you a cat?

Re: Toothpaste made with keratin may protect and repair damaged teeth: study

#27
post #19

[flagged]

Not really. People started having issues with teeth when we switched to farming and went from a diverse diet to a pretty poor one (grain, grain, grain).

Sugar, high fructose corn syrup, and acidic drinks such as coffee and cola does almost all the damage.

Re: Toothpaste made with keratin may protect and repair damaged teeth: study

#30
post #4

Was thinking about oddities of language recently (happens a lot since moving to Germany), specifically how "toothpaste" isn't made from teeth and "tomato paste" isn't something you rub onto a tomato. So anyway, should we be calling this "hairpaste for teeth", or "toothpaste from hair"?

This semantic variability in the relation between the two nouns of a compound is pretty common in compound nouns: "Y made of X", like "tomato paste", "Y used (somehow) for X" (like "toothpaste", "paintbrush", "electrical outlet"--here an adjective, but still a lexicalized phrase), "Y in X" ("treehouse"), "Y for X" ("doghouse"), "Y containing X" ("paint can"), not to mention metaphorical uses, with some etymological relation between X and Y ("moon shot", "crapshoot", "greenhouse"), and so on. Not to mention multi-word compounds, like "greenhouse gas"--but I'm sure you've seen lots of those in Germany :).
Post reply on HN