Live data from Hacker News

Blood oxygen monitoring returning to Apple Watch in the US

apple.com

141–150 of 357 posts

Re: Blood oxygen monitoring returning to Apple Watch in the US

#141

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Software patents are a scourge.

I would be a bit more sympathetic if this was not about a trillion dollar company who poached some employees rather than engage in a licensing deal.

> I would be a bit more sympathetic if this was not about a trillion dollar company who poached some employees rather than engage in a licensing deal.

Obviously the people who suffer are customers. There isn't a single instance where IP helps them.

Re: Blood oxygen monitoring returning to Apple Watch in the US

#143
post #103

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> For anyone remotely healthy, 100% of the time your real value will be between 95% and 99%, and there is almost no diagnostic value to it. Sure, but if the value is less than 95, that does have diagnostic value (if it's accurate)

Sure, but unlike heart conditions where people often have no idea (about afib, or even abnormally high or low heart rates), people generally know when they have respiratory difficulties. Like the other comment noted something about family having pneumonia, and I cannot understand how the watch would have made their situation better. If someone in that state wasn't already seeking medical advice, it's hugely unlikely…

Seems to me, it has some value (again, if it's accurate) for letting people know about sleep apnea; especially as part of an overall sleep tracking dodad.

I've got enough mild asthma around me that we have a finger pulseox (or two cause we "lost" one and found it later) and I've started yelling at sick people to check it once in a while. Cause they don't usually think to, but sometimes it lingers and by the time they decide to go into an office, the numbers are pretty low.

Of course, we're not on the Apple bandwagon and stopped wearing watches once we got used to having pocket watches again.

Re: Blood oxygen monitoring returning to Apple Watch in the US

#144
post #96
post #77

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Masimo was worth ~$16B when this was going down. They are worth $8B today. This is roughly the size of American Airlines. Masimo is not the biggest company, but they are a large publicly-traded company. The company does $2B in revenue and spends close to $800 million annually in sales, general and admin. This is over 3x their R&D budget. (For reference, Apple's R&D spend is higher than its SG&A spend.) Per levels.fyi…

I disagree with your assertion that Masimo has the money to compete. Apple's upside to employing these folks to build the tech into the Apple Watch is FAR, FAR greater than Masimo's potential sales growth for existing pulse ox devices (or patent licenses). With Apple Watches being licensed as medical devices for ECG & pulse ox, this gives clinicians even more reason to leverage them with patients for convenient 24/7…

Masimo sells a health monitoring watch. [1] There is direct competition here.

[1]. https://www.masimo.com/products/monitors/masimo-w1-medical-w...

Re: Blood oxygen monitoring returning to Apple Watch in the US

#145
post #51

Earlier quoted context omitted.

And as a hypothetical sought after employee, how is that my problem? If another company wants to roll a shit ton of money up to my doorstep, why shouldn’t I take it? Should I be treating my employer “like family” and care about “the mission”?

It's about the company anti-competitive behaviour. No one said anything about the employees.

This is almost farcical. This is literally the opposite of anti-competitive. Please take a basic economics course and pass it before spouting off about economics online.

Re: Blood oxygen monitoring returning to Apple Watch in the US

#146
post #88

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Is there evidence of Apple doing this in the past?

Apple is infamous for driving other companies into bankruptcy to acquire their assets. For a single example, see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Exponential_Technology

That’s not evidence of Apple doing mass layoffs, though.

Re: Blood oxygen monitoring returning to Apple Watch in the US

#147

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Yes, very good for the employees. Apple even offered them 2x their salaries to leave Masimo.

Yes "very good", until Apple decides to mass-layoff them, because now, owning the valuable core IP and having killed their primary competitor in the field, Apple can do whatever they want and get away with it because those employees have nowhere else to go in the area. 200+ IQ move . How people on HN can support monopolization of markets and killing of competition is beyond me, since in the end it always bites them i…

Lamego only stayed at Apple six months. He was very productive. He filed 12 new patents for Apple. But he apparently had disputes with managers. The details aren't entirely clear. But Lamego ended up resigning. After leaving Apple, he founded his own company, True Wearables, which was also successfully sued by Masimo for trade secret theft.

Re: Blood oxygen monitoring returning to Apple Watch in the US

#148
post #121
post #93

Earlier quoted context omitted.

(I couldn't reply down another level.) >How HN can support monopolization of markets and killing of [sic] competition is beyond me. That suggests HN is a monoculture of some sort of united front. It is not. Diversity of opinion is best for this community (and all communities). And, sorry, what competition was killed off here? I, as the consumer, was never considering Massimo for my blood oxygen measurement needs. I b…

Why were you never considering them for your blood oxygen measurement needs?

Because why would I want to destroy the planet by purchasing an additional new watch for each single feature that I wanted to leverage? This seems hugely damaging to the environment just to enrich the lives of < 100 people.

Re: Blood oxygen monitoring returning to Apple Watch in the US

#149

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Crazy that this is a 'patent'. We did this experiment in high school 30 years ago.

almost as crazy as a patent for a rectangle with rounded corners

You can also patent the shape of a bottle. https://patents.google.com/patent/USD48160S/en (yes, its an old one).

These fall into the classification of design patent which covers ornamental non-functional elements of a particular item. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Design_patent

Design patents also cover typefaces. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intellectual_property_protecti... -- note that typefaces cannot be copyrighted in the United States

Design patents differ from a utility patent which covers how something works.

Post reply on HN