Live data from Hacker News

Blood oxygen monitoring returning to Apple Watch in the US

apple.com

31–40 of 357 posts

Re: Blood oxygen monitoring returning to Apple Watch in the US

#31
post #29

In my experience, the Apple Watch blood oxygen monitoring was horribly inaccurate. It would report wildly variable results, often telling me that I had a blood oxygen level of 80% (which, if true, would indicate that I should be getting myself to an emergency room ASAP). Regular pulse oxygen meters are cheap and reliable.

In contrast my Garmin and finger pulseox match exactly.

Re: Blood oxygen monitoring returning to Apple Watch in the US

#32
post #28

Hopefully blood glucose monitoring will come soon as well

I'm out of the loop, can this be done without drawing blood now?

You can do it by using interstitial fluid, which is how CGMs work.

But, in short, no, not yet: https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/safety-communications/do...

Re: Blood oxygen monitoring returning to Apple Watch in the US

#33

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I would be a bit more sympathetic if this was not about a trillion dollar company who poached some employees rather than engage in a licensing deal.

It's really easy to avoid your employees being "poached": treat them well, and pay them better.

[dead]

Re: Blood oxygen monitoring returning to Apple Watch in the US

#34
post #29

In my experience, the Apple Watch blood oxygen monitoring was horribly inaccurate. It would report wildly variable results, often telling me that I had a blood oxygen level of 80% (which, if true, would indicate that I should be getting myself to an emergency room ASAP). Regular pulse oxygen meters are cheap and reliable.

Indeed, just generally this is a silly feature that was used to sell updated devices, but has almost no value to end users. There is shockingly little diagnostic value of the reading unless you are in such a critical state that you likely want something better than an incredibly unreliable and inaccurate smartwatch feature cram.

For anyone remotely healthy, 100% of the time your real value will be between 95% and 99%, and there is almost no diagnostic value to it. Heart rate is actually interesting and is something you can learn from and work towards. SpO2 is just "eh...neat".

Re: Blood oxygen monitoring returning to Apple Watch in the US

#36

Earlier quoted context omitted.

25 employees including the CTO, and then bought a building nearby to Masimo's office for them to work in. At least according to the CEO of Masimo in public statements. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RR1o8EoW-Eg

Sounds good for the employees, so go Apple?

lol from the company that colluded with multiple other companies to keep developer salaries down.

Re: Blood oxygen monitoring returning to Apple Watch in the US

#37

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I would be a bit more sympathetic if this was not about a trillion dollar company who poached some employees rather than engage in a licensing deal.

It's really easy to avoid your employees being "poached": treat them well, and pay them better.

Or just collude with your rival companies ala Steve Jobs.

Re: Blood oxygen monitoring returning to Apple Watch in the US

#38

Earlier quoted context omitted.

25 employees including the CTO, and then bought a building nearby to Masimo's office for them to work in. At least according to the CEO of Masimo in public statements. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RR1o8EoW-Eg

Sounds good for the employees, so go Apple?

Good for everyone except whoever had money invested in Masimo

Re: Blood oxygen monitoring returning to Apple Watch in the US

#39
post #29

In my experience, the Apple Watch blood oxygen monitoring was horribly inaccurate. It would report wildly variable results, often telling me that I had a blood oxygen level of 80% (which, if true, would indicate that I should be getting myself to an emergency room ASAP). Regular pulse oxygen meters are cheap and reliable.

In contrast my Garmin and finger pulseox match exactly.

Yep, my Garmin also has matched the doctors office instrument to the 1% every time.

Re: Blood oxygen monitoring returning to Apple Watch in the US

#40

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I would be a bit more sympathetic if this was not about a trillion dollar company who poached some employees rather than engage in a licensing deal.

It's really easy to avoid your employees being "poached": treat them well, and pay them better.

- is what Tim Cook told himself to vanquish the last bit of uneasiness. Then he took of his glasses, set them on the night stand, and slept better than he had in years.
Post reply on HN