In my experience, the Apple Watch blood oxygen monitoring was horribly inaccurate. It would report wildly variable results, often telling me that I had a blood oxygen level of 80% (which, if true, would indicate that I should be getting myself to an emergency room ASAP). Regular pulse oxygen meters are cheap and reliable.
Blood oxygen monitoring returning to Apple Watch in the US
31–40 of 357 posts
Re: Blood oxygen monitoring returning to Apple Watch in the US
#32Hopefully blood glucose monitoring will come soon as well
I'm out of the loop, can this be done without drawing blood now?
But, in short, no, not yet: https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/safety-communications/do...
Re: Blood oxygen monitoring returning to Apple Watch in the US
#33Earlier quoted context omitted.
I would be a bit more sympathetic if this was not about a trillion dollar company who poached some employees rather than engage in a licensing deal.
It's really easy to avoid your employees being "poached": treat them well, and pay them better.
Re: Blood oxygen monitoring returning to Apple Watch in the US
#34In my experience, the Apple Watch blood oxygen monitoring was horribly inaccurate. It would report wildly variable results, often telling me that I had a blood oxygen level of 80% (which, if true, would indicate that I should be getting myself to an emergency room ASAP). Regular pulse oxygen meters are cheap and reliable.
For anyone remotely healthy, 100% of the time your real value will be between 95% and 99%, and there is almost no diagnostic value to it. Heart rate is actually interesting and is something you can learn from and work towards. SpO2 is just "eh...neat".
Re: Blood oxygen monitoring returning to Apple Watch in the US
#35What's the US Customs ruling in question? > This update was enabled by a recent U.S. Customs ruling.
Re: Blood oxygen monitoring returning to Apple Watch in the US
#36Earlier quoted context omitted.
25 employees including the CTO, and then bought a building nearby to Masimo's office for them to work in. At least according to the CEO of Masimo in public statements. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RR1o8EoW-Eg
Sounds good for the employees, so go Apple?
Re: Blood oxygen monitoring returning to Apple Watch in the US
#37Earlier quoted context omitted.
I would be a bit more sympathetic if this was not about a trillion dollar company who poached some employees rather than engage in a licensing deal.
It's really easy to avoid your employees being "poached": treat them well, and pay them better.
Re: Blood oxygen monitoring returning to Apple Watch in the US
#38Earlier quoted context omitted.
25 employees including the CTO, and then bought a building nearby to Masimo's office for them to work in. At least according to the CEO of Masimo in public statements. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RR1o8EoW-Eg
Sounds good for the employees, so go Apple?
Re: Blood oxygen monitoring returning to Apple Watch in the US
#39In my experience, the Apple Watch blood oxygen monitoring was horribly inaccurate. It would report wildly variable results, often telling me that I had a blood oxygen level of 80% (which, if true, would indicate that I should be getting myself to an emergency room ASAP). Regular pulse oxygen meters are cheap and reliable.
In contrast my Garmin and finger pulseox match exactly.
Re: Blood oxygen monitoring returning to Apple Watch in the US
#40Earlier quoted context omitted.
I would be a bit more sympathetic if this was not about a trillion dollar company who poached some employees rather than engage in a licensing deal.
It's really easy to avoid your employees being "poached": treat them well, and pay them better.