PYX: The next step in Python packaging
1–10 of 479 posts
Re: PYX: The next step in Python packaging
#2Re: PYX: The next step in Python packaging
#3Re: PYX: The next step in Python packaging
#4Re: PYX: The next step in Python packaging
#5Re: PYX: The next step in Python packaging
#6Re: PYX: The next step in Python packaging
#7Been waiting to see what Astral would do first (with regards to product). Seems like a mix of artifactory and conda? artifactory providing a package server and conda trying to fix the difficulty that comes from Python packages with compiled components or dependencies, mostly solved by wheels, but of course PyTorch wheels requiring specific CUDA can still be a mess that conda fixes
Re: PYX: The next step in Python packaging
#8https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44712558
Now what do we have here?
Re: PYX: The next step in Python packaging
#9Re: PYX: The next step in Python packaging
#10We've been fed promises like these before. They will inevitably get acquired. Years of documentation, issues, and pull requests will be deleted with little-to-no notice. An exclusively commercial replacement will materialize from the new company that is inexplicably missing the features you relied on in the first place.