Am i missing something? If it costs karma to comment and you have no karma, how are you supposed to earn enough to start commenting again?
A proposal for improving HN : it should cost a user Karma to post
81–90 of 286 posts
Re: A proposal for improving HN : it should cost a user Karma to post
#82Am I the only one who hasn't noticed this huge drop in quality that has everyone bitching and moaning lately? The signal-to-noise ratio has dropped slightly compared to when I started reading about four years ago, but this is still a great place for technical discussion. Comparisons to Reddit and other such nonsense are baseless. HN does not need any major overhaul or whatever else. I think a lot of this is just old-…
I feel like there was a fast slide to content-free echo chamberism a while ago. HN was starting to become painfully predictable if it didn't talk about: - Apple in glowing terms - a LISP - how massive overvaluations were not a bad sign Certain HN rockstars would receive hundreds of upvotes for the most minor of comments and the fanboyism towards a few specific companies, products and people was so thick you could cut…
Re: A proposal for improving HN : it should cost a user Karma to post
#83Am I the only one who hasn't noticed this huge drop in quality that has everyone bitching and moaning lately? The signal-to-noise ratio has dropped slightly compared to when I started reading about four years ago, but this is still a great place for technical discussion. Comparisons to Reddit and other such nonsense are baseless. HN does not need any major overhaul or whatever else. I think a lot of this is just old-…
It's been 5 years, and I've changed. I've become much more knowledgeable than I was five years ago (partly because of HN) and obviously the barrier for what I find insightful has been raised. This is a natural progression in life, and it happens to everyone. Chances are that if you look at what you did 5 or 10 years ago you'll find it to be naive, shallow or obvious.
Maybe it's simply time to move on.
Re: A proposal for improving HN : it should cost a user Karma to post
#84Re: A proposal for improving HN : it should cost a user Karma to post
#85Am I the only one who hasn't noticed this huge drop in quality that has everyone bitching and moaning lately? The signal-to-noise ratio has dropped slightly compared to when I started reading about four years ago, but this is still a great place for technical discussion. Comparisons to Reddit and other such nonsense are baseless. HN does not need any major overhaul or whatever else. I think a lot of this is just old-…
Re: A proposal for improving HN : it should cost a user Karma to post
#86Re: A proposal for improving HN : it should cost a user Karma to post
#87Re: A proposal for improving HN : it should cost a user Karma to post
#88Re: A proposal for improving HN : it should cost a user Karma to post
#89On the bottom of every page is a clearly defined link for everyone to make whatever "Feature Requests" they want: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=363 The owner of this site, pg, helpfully provides that thread for feature/meta discussion, and kindly requests for feature/meta discussion be placed there. If you had searched for and read all of the previous meta discussion on potential HN features, then you'd know y…
Re: A proposal for improving HN : it should cost a user Karma to post
#90I don't care about (HN) karma, and i believe (a.k.a. untested hypothesis) most HNers don't care about it. In conclusion i don't think that adding / subtracting something most people don't care about will solve ... anything.
i think the idea is more like stackoverflow - where your points (karma) gives you access to certain things. If you have 0 karma - you cant comment. If you have low karma - you want to 'save' your posts for valid comments that are likely to get upvoted, thus giving you more karma to make more posts etc. i.e. people who post 'crap' and get continually downvoted will eventually be silenced.