31–40 of 81 posts
Although I like the idea, I personally prefer Pulse.me. It has pictures and resized articles according to their significance. Screenshot: http://i.imgur.com/W1NKw.png
I'm a big fan of "significance", "buzz", and "personalization" in theory, but I find it easier to skim some text myself.
To me it would be much better to get rid of the origin altogether to help eliminate bias and focus on the actual story.
The more time I spend consuming, the less time I spend producing. And this is an online content firehose. It looks very nice and tempting, but thanks, but no, thanks.
Although I like the idea, I personally prefer Pulse.me. It has pictures and resized articles according to their significance. Screenshot: http://i.imgur.com/W1NKw.png
Pulse looks like a neat idea, but I can't stand the layout. Where should my eyes go? I'm a big fan of "significance", "buzz", and "personalization" in theory, but I find it easier to skim some text myself.
I find that I can skim more easily with a few images that provide additional visual cues other than those of textual information. Pictures require a different visual focus, and might allow me to focus on the "bigger picture" (e.g. whether it is coming from WSJ), or "smaller picture" (i.e. more specific examples).
Additionally, I like that you can mix the sources together, with not too much of anything; instead emphasising a more holistic view.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Pulse looks like a neat idea, but I can't stand the layout. Where should my eyes go? I'm a big fan of "significance", "buzz", and "personalization" in theory, but I find it easier to skim some text myself.
Re: "Where should my eyes go?" I find that I can skim more easily with a few images that provide additional visual cues other than those of textual information. Pictures require a different visual focus, and might allow me to focus on the "bigger picture" (e.g. whether it is coming from WSJ), or "smaller picture" (i.e. more specific examples). Additionally, I like that you can mix the sources together, with not too m…
I know it will take away a few links from the viewarea but you will be able to read them faster IMHO.
May i suggest line-height: 160% I know it will take away a few links from the viewarea but you will be able to read them faster IMHO.
Perhaps a toggle of some sort?