Live data from Hacker News

Basic Social Skills Guide

improveyoursocialskills.com

271–280 of 283 posts

Re: Basic Social Skills Guide

#271

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Hunting/fishing are one type of "outdoor stuff".

Like how bombs / machine guns are types of “engineering”? :)

Sure.

I believe that anyone who eats meat cannot take a moral stance against hunting in general. An animal that lived in the wild then was killed and eaten lived a more fulfilling life than an animal in a factory farm that was killed and eaten.

Re: Basic Social Skills Guide

#272
post #94

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> I've found that no mater what country I've been to, or what social classes the people belong to, three topics have a 95% success rate when it comes to social relations with guys: sports, cars, fishing/hunting. And to some degree handywork. Have you generally been to the Americas and Western Europe? Sports is the one universal, that makes sense in my experience too. But most people outside the rich upper class don't…

What do Asians talk about then?

Food of course!

Re: Basic Social Skills Guide

#273

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Like how bombs / machine guns are types of “engineering”? :)

Sure. I believe that anyone who eats meat cannot take a moral stance against hunting in general. An animal that lived in the wild then was killed and eaten lived a more fulfilling life than an animal in a factory farm that was killed and eaten.

I think that’s fair; I’m coming up on seven years meat-free and can confidently say that hunting is disgusting.

Whether done in captivity or in the wild, there is no such thing as humane slaughter.

Re: Basic Social Skills Guide

#274

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Is this AI spam or psychosis? I don't understand.

3rd option is you just don't understand. This is language people use to describe narcissists. Flying monkeys are people who help them manipulate others and vampires are "emotional vampires". Poster was saying a narcissist had died, leaving their support people leaderless.

Is a lay ontology that's basically a folk offshoot of the proverbial 5th edition practitioner's manual and people use to keep the question of ethics in our closes relationships at arm's length (because they've also, like you and I, found this self-consistent set of just-so stories weirdly smeared atop all useful ethics and psychology discourse on the Internet) proto-AI spam or the reins of as many future mass psychoses as the doctor ordered? And are we cool yet?

Re: Basic Social Skills Guide

#275

Earlier quoted context omitted.

3rd option is you just don't understand. This is language people use to describe narcissists. Flying monkeys are people who help them manipulate others and vampires are "emotional vampires". Poster was saying a narcissist had died, leaving their support people leaderless.

It's an extremely uncalibrated reply given the context regardless, even more so expecting the general audience here to understand this weirdly specific language. Something is definitely off.

Calibrate my barometer, good sir. Needed to hang around the 80s a little longer.

Re: Basic Social Skills Guide

#276

Earlier quoted context omitted.

3rd option is you just don't understand. This is language people use to describe narcissists. Flying monkeys are people who help them manipulate others and vampires are "emotional vampires". Poster was saying a narcissist had died, leaving their support people leaderless.

I think you're right, but for a wonderful second I thought there was some weird fantasy reference going on

Weird fantasies are fun and all until the world demands that you fit them into a pre-configured narrative a la whoever and then you lose the ability to have them.

Re: Basic Social Skills Guide

#277

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Your comment is the only one hateful here. Where I'm from there are absolutely different topics to talk to men and women. You may hate it as much as you like, but that's the world many of us live in.

He's very probably mocking "the woke" by exaggerating how they criticize people...

Oh, man. I think you are right, I can't believe i took it at face value.

Re: Basic Social Skills Guide

#278

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It's an extremely uncalibrated reply given the context regardless, even more so expecting the general audience here to understand this weirdly specific language. Something is definitely off.

Calibrate my barometer, good sir. Needed to hang around the 80s a little longer.

Could you explain how it relates to what you were replying to about breaking down funerals?

Re: Basic Social Skills Guide

#279

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Like how bombs / machine guns are types of “engineering”? :)

Sure. I believe that anyone who eats meat cannot take a moral stance against hunting in general. An animal that lived in the wild then was killed and eaten lived a more fulfilling life than an animal in a factory farm that was killed and eaten.

FWIW, I didn't mean to make it a moral argument. I'm just not personally interested in hunting and fishing, but I don't have an ethical problem with them if done in moderation. Nature is violent and ruthless... a well-aimed shot is one of the less miserable ways for a wild animal to die. And yes, they're absolutely outdoor activities :)

Like you said, it's at least better than factory farming, and in some cases, hunters are an important part of conservation efforts.

I happen to be vegan, but have also had a few friends who hunt & fish. I don't fault them for it, or hunters in general. It's just not something I would want to discuss with them or join them for. Not out of any ethical quandary, it's just not something I want to spend my time doing or thinking about (heh, they're just far less exciting when you can't eat what you catch).

Re: Basic Social Skills Guide

#280

Earlier quoted context omitted.

If only someone could create an app or website to help us uninformed out with common phrases to use. Sentences like: "Did you see that ludicrous display last night?"

The problem with this is when the convo goes beyond the initial common phrase. The response is likely to go more in depth. Then you're stuck nodding awkwardly, laughing awkwardly or just fudging it further... Awkwardly. Personally if it's a sport I'm not into I'll just admit that and explain why. The conversation will usually naturally move on and you won't seem phony.

The person you’re responding to was making a joke/reference.

https://youtu.be/EfE-ts3IwPM?t=68

https://www.imdb.com/title/tt1320784/

Post reply on HN