Earlier quoted context omitted.
I work in FAANG, have been for over a decade. These tools are creating a huge amount of value, starting with Copilot but now with tools like Claude Code and Cursor. The people doing so don’t have a lot of time to comment about it on HN since we’re busy building things.
> These tools are creating a huge amount of value... > The people doing so don’t have a lot of time to comment about it on HN since we’re busy building… “We’re so much more productive that we don’t have time to tell you how much more productive we are” Do you see how that sounds?
Claude Sonnet 4 now supports 1M tokens of context
221–230 of 706 posts
Re: Claude Sonnet 4 now supports 1M tokens of context
#222Earlier quoted context omitted.
How do you know that?
https://research.trychroma.com/context-rot
When they announced Big Contexts in 2023, they referenced being able to find a single changed sentence in the context's copy of Great Gatsby[1]. This example seemed _incredible_ to me at the time but now two years later I'm feeling like it was pretty cherry-picked. What does everyone else think? Could you feed a novel into an LLM and expect it to find the single change?
Re: Claude Sonnet 4 now supports 1M tokens of context
#223Earlier quoted context omitted.
> This week, I used it to write ESP32 firmware and a Linux kernel driver. I'm not meaning to be negative at all, but was this for a toy/hobby or for a commercial project? I find that LLMs do very well on small greenfield toy/hobby projects but basically fall over when brought into commercial projects that often have bespoke requirements and standards (i.e. has to cross compile on qcc, comply with autosar, in-house bu…
I work in FAANG, have been for over a decade. These tools are creating a huge amount of value, starting with Copilot but now with tools like Claude Code and Cursor. The people doing so don’t have a lot of time to comment about it on HN since we’re busy building things.
Re: Claude Sonnet 4 now supports 1M tokens of context
#224Earlier quoted context omitted.
Well put. It really does come down to nuance. I find Claude is amazing at writing React / Typescript. I mostly let it do it's own thing and skim the results after. I have it write Storybook components so I can visually confirm things look how I want. If something isn't quite right I'll take a look and if I can spot the problem and fix it myself, I'll do that. If I can't quickly spot it, I'll write up a prompt describ…
Do you only skim the results or do you audit them at some point to prevent security issues?
Re: Claude Sonnet 4 now supports 1M tokens of context
#225This is definitely one of my CORE problem as I use these tools for "professional software engineering." I really desperately need LLMs to maintain extremely effective context and it's not actually that interesting to see a new model that's marginally better than the next one (for my day-to-day). However. Price is king. Allowing me to flood the context window with my code base is great, but given that the price has su…
Re: Claude Sonnet 4 now supports 1M tokens of context
#226Earlier quoted context omitted.
Well put. It really does come down to nuance. I find Claude is amazing at writing React / Typescript. I mostly let it do it's own thing and skim the results after. I have it write Storybook components so I can visually confirm things look how I want. If something isn't quite right I'll take a look and if I can spot the problem and fix it myself, I'll do that. If I can't quickly spot it, I'll write up a prompt describ…
For this very reason I switched for TS for backend as well. I'm not a big fun of JS but the productivity gain of having shared types between frontend and backend and the Claude code proficiency with TS is immense.
Re: Claude Sonnet 4 now supports 1M tokens of context
#227Earlier quoted context omitted.
Agreed, and it drives me bonkers when people talk about AI coding as if it represents some a single technique, process, or tool. Makes me wonder if people spoke this way about “using computers” or “using the internet” in the olden days. We don’t even fully agree on the best practices for writing code without AI.
> Makes me wonder if people spoke this way about “using computers” or “using the internet” in the olden days. Older person here: they absolutely did, all over the place in the early 90s. I remember people decrying projects that moved them to computers everywhere I went. Doctors offices, auto mechanics, etc. Then later, people did the same thing about the Internet (was written with a single word capital I by 2000, hav…
Re: Claude Sonnet 4 now supports 1M tokens of context
#228Earlier quoted context omitted.
For me it’s meant a huge increase in productivity, at least 3X. Since so many claim the opposite, I’m curious to what you do more specifically? I guess different roles/technologies benefit more from agents than others. I build full stack web applications in node/.net/react, more importantly (I think) is that I work on a small startup and manage 3 applications myself.
3X if not 10X if you are starting a new project with Next.js, React, Tailwind CSS for a fullstack website development, that solves an everyday problem. Yeah I just witnessed that yesterday when creating a toy project. For my company's codebase, where we use internal tools and proprietary technology, solving a problem that does not exist outside the specific domain, on a codebase of over 1000 files? No way. Even locat…
Re: Claude Sonnet 4 now supports 1M tokens of context
#229Re: Claude Sonnet 4 now supports 1M tokens of context
#230Earlier quoted context omitted.
Whenever I read comments from the people singing their praises of the technology, it's hard not to think of the study that found AI tools made developers slower in early 2025. >When developers are allowed to use AI tools, they take 19% longer to complete issues—a significant slowdown that goes against developer beliefs and expert forecasts. This gap between perception and reality is striking: developers expected AI t…
Ah, the very extensive study with 16 developers. Bulletproof results.