I am not a fan of Emacs whatsoever (I find it a buggy mess where everything works only 80%), but org mode is absolutely fantastic for this.
I tried every todo app and ended up with a .txt file
11–20 of 831 posts
Re: I tried every todo app and ended up with a .txt file
#12Re: I tried every todo app and ended up with a .txt file
#13It's one step up from a single txt file. You only need to use one text file with it. It's like a nice UI for a single todo text file.
Re: I tried every todo app and ended up with a .txt file
#14It does one thing a text file struggles at: scheduling recurring tasks and adding notes to a recurring task. I have annual reminders for infrequent, but important stuff. For example, I have a recurring annual task to review my insurance. Each year, I add context and details that are easily forgotten. Then, when the reminder comes up next year, I can refresh my memory and complete the task quickly.
Re: I tried every todo app and ended up with a .txt file
#15Re: I tried every todo app and ended up with a .txt file
#16I don't intend particularly to advocate the format here, but I will say that of all my many bookshelves, in a certain way there's none I find more satisfying than the one I work to fill myself. Is that worth more than being able to use grep(1) on their contents? Or are those contents worth more to me because I can't? Who could say, but it's fun to think about, at least. (And for those young enough to be easily swayed by vanity, if you think performative reading is in fashion right now...)
Re: I tried every todo app and ended up with a .txt file
#17https://Simpletaskmanager.vercel.app
All the info is locally hosted.
Re: I tried every todo app and ended up with a .txt file
#18As a developer, however, I have to scratch the itch of always having "wrangleable" data, and yet again text files are the best at it. I am already thinking of doing this and just follow a set of writing "guidelines" so I can parse the txt if I wanted to do some visualization stuff.