Live data from Hacker News

A message from Intel CEO Lip-Bu Tan to all company employees

newsroom.intel.com

131–140 of 274 posts

Re: A message from Intel CEO Lip-Bu Tan to all company employees

#132

So now being a bad CEO who is not of European ethnicity, will have the sitting president insinuate you not so subtly for treason. Wild. A cursory Wikipedia search confirms Tan was born in Malaysia, has lived in US for 40+ years in California, and is a practicing Christian.

It's sad that people read the headlines and immediately start screaming "racism!". I don't know if Lip-Bu Tan has done anything wrong or not, but at least there's enough evidence to suggest a massive conflict of interest and particularly the Cadence affair stinks really bad. Maybe it turns out somehow Lip-Bu Tan is completely unconnected to any of this, but claiming this all just because he's "not of European ethnicity" is complete bullshit. It's not his ethnicity, it's his actions and connections.

Re: A message from Intel CEO Lip-Bu Tan to all company employees

#133

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I don't really understand this. Intel was (and arguably still is) too large relative to its current technical capabilities. Yet even in this current “bad chips” era, Intel is only, at worst, about 10% behind in gaming performance (largely due to cache disparity) and is on par or better in most other workloads. From the K10 era until Zen 3, AMD processors were objectively worse (sometimes comically so) and AMD still m…

> Yet even in this current “bad chips” era, Intel is only, at worst, about 10% behind in gaming performance (largely due to cache disparity) Gaming is irrelevant. For AMD, gaming (both console and PC combined) is less revenue than embedded-- things like those routers you can get off of aliexpress and Synology NASes. Enterprise, cloud, and AI are the only things that matter, and even enterprise is falling off. Back in…

I’ve found that a lot of my friends who are into pc gaming still haven’t grokked that ever since the crypto boom, much less the ai boom, that they are the old toys that no one wants to play with anymore.

I had a friend who legitimately could not understand why Nvidia didn’t care about their reputation in the gaming market souring even after I showed him the numbers on how much nvidia is selling to corporations now.

I don’t know if it was an inability to deal with the numbers or if it’s just culture shock at going from being a valued client to as you said “baggage”, but it was a surprising number of people in that camp

Re: A message from Intel CEO Lip-Bu Tan to all company employees

#135
post #45

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I'll answer this in earnest, assuming you're asking in good faith. The president commands an enormous amount of power, and has an army of people who will do his bidding and simply adopt his opinions on any number of subjects. Shouting out to millions of his followers to state that the CEO of a private company is "CONFLICTED" and must resign is, by any definition, propaganda. Propaganda that changes the minds of the c…

I am asking in good faith and I understand why there would be a preference towards private versus public. It sounds like Trump does not care to attempt a private conversation as he wants Tan out. The Cadence settlement is likely the only public info we have about Tan's conflicts, the government has more info and they aren't going to spend time working through private channels, though it sounds like Tan is trying that…

I’m struggling to believe you are asking in good faith. He answered your question and your immediate response is to try and defend what the president did in terms of violating norms.

It seems like youve had an agenda since before you asked the question

Re: A message from Intel CEO Lip-Bu Tan to all company employees

#136
post #5

It's honestly wild that a sitting US president is calling out specific company CEOs. The fact that it was done in a tweet-esque post is even more concerning. I'd expect that something like this would have been accompanied by a proper investigation and writeup stating the administration's perspective on why, but instead it's just "he's highly CONFLICTED". I don't debate his history at Cadence Design is concerning from…

> It's honestly wild that a sitting US president is calling out specific company CEOs

This truly never happened before. Oh wait:

https://www.politico.com/story/2009/03/gm-ceo-resigns-at-oba...

Re: A message from Intel CEO Lip-Bu Tan to all company employees

#137
post #5

It's honestly wild that a sitting US president is calling out specific company CEOs. The fact that it was done in a tweet-esque post is even more concerning. I'd expect that something like this would have been accompanied by a proper investigation and writeup stating the administration's perspective on why, but instead it's just "he's highly CONFLICTED". I don't debate his history at Cadence Design is concerning from…

Must have been great to be buddies with Trump and get the heads up so you could short Intel right before his tweet.

Re: A message from Intel CEO Lip-Bu Tan to all company employees

#138
post #19

Lots of en dashes.

They looked too short to be em dashes and too long to be en dashes. Sure enough, they're neither. They're minus signs. The AI is evolving.

Nope they’re en dashes. Minus signs aren’t longer than en dashes anyway.

Re: A message from Intel CEO Lip-Bu Tan to all company employees

#139

So now being a bad CEO who is not of European ethnicity, will have the sitting president insinuate you not so subtly for treason. Wild. A cursory Wikipedia search confirms Tan was born in Malaysia, has lived in US for 40+ years in California, and is a practicing Christian.

What does being Christian have to do with anything?

Re: A message from Intel CEO Lip-Bu Tan to all company employees

#140
post #90

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> If true … I don’t know about his investments, but one fact is clear: he was CEO of Cadence Design Systems, which has just pleaded guilty to federal charges for exporting technology to China. That alone should make him ineligible to lead a company with major government contracts. If he resigns (and he will), the board should go with him.

If Tan resigns I suspect only way Pat would come back is with an entirely new board, so either way it's likely the board is done.

How effective would Gelsinger be at returning after the then previous CEO took the company in a totally different path and practically trashed Gelsinger’s original plan?
Post reply on HN