Live data from Hacker News

A message from Intel CEO Lip-Bu Tan to all company employees

newsroom.intel.com

81–90 of 274 posts

Re: A message from Intel CEO Lip-Bu Tan to all company employees

#82
post #15

What are the odds this ends with Intel getting nationalized? I think it's really looking kind of non-zero now.

It doesn't need to get officially nationalized. Trump is already using tariffs to essentially direct large businesses. It's already been reported that Trump is requiring TSMC to take a 49% stake in Intel for tariff relief.

Why would TSMC do this? Companies want the best chips and they can only get them from TSMC. If there isn't an alternative and building the necessary infrastructure in the US takes too long the Tarif is useless.

Re: A message from Intel CEO Lip-Bu Tan to all company employees

#85
post #70

Earlier quoted context omitted.

If the US or the Netherlands were being invaded that world also wreak havoc, but how is that related to the links between China and Intel's CEO?

Invading the US or Netherlands would not impact chip production. How are you not able to grasp that?

Besides missing the point, this is a bad argument.

ASML manufactures the machines that TSMC uses to produce chips - they have an even more critical and irreplaceable role in chip production than Taiwan does. ASML is headquartered in Veldhoven, NL. That would absolutely affect chip production - no new nodes, no replacement parts. There are other critical technologies for semiconductor manufacturing made in USA as well.

Re: A message from Intel CEO Lip-Bu Tan to all company employees

#86
post #4

Some context is available here: https://apnews.com/article/intel-trump-cotton-yeary-tan-2061... FTA: “In March 2025, Intel appointed Lip-Bu Tan as its new CEO,” Cotton wrote in the letter. “Mr. Tan reportedly controls dozens of Chinese companies and has a stake in hundreds of Chinese advanced-manufacturing and chip firms. At least eight of these companies reportedly have ties to the Chinese People’s Liberation Army.”

[flagged]

Re: A message from Intel CEO Lip-Bu Tan to all company employees

#87
post #55

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Yes, what actually happened is important. In that Constitution story, a government website that has the Constitution's text was updated in a peculiar way. It could be interpreted as having been related to habeas corpus rights, as that was in the middle of the removal. It could also be interpreted as unintentional, as the deletion started in the middle of Article I Section 8. You'd think a targeted deletion wouldn't i…

Just so we're clear that you apparently still think it's possible that an order came down from the top to delete Congress's authorization to form a Navy from the Library of Congress's online annotated Constitution, which isn't even in the first SERP for me on Google for "online constitution", but I guess you've gotta start somewhere.

Dude, he altered a weather map with a Sharpie on live TV.

Re: A message from Intel CEO Lip-Bu Tan to all company employees

#88

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Stupid flamebait. Not a sitting president and the NSA doesn't need a warrant for foreign targets.

https://www.politico.com/story/2009/03/gm-ceo-resigns-at-oba...

Don't forget the context: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2008_financial_crisis

Re: A message from Intel CEO Lip-Bu Tan to all company employees

#90
post #4

Some context is available here: https://apnews.com/article/intel-trump-cotton-yeary-tan-2061... FTA: “In March 2025, Intel appointed Lip-Bu Tan as its new CEO,” Cotton wrote in the letter. “Mr. Tan reportedly controls dozens of Chinese companies and has a stake in hundreds of Chinese advanced-manufacturing and chip firms. At least eight of these companies reportedly have ties to the Chinese People’s Liberation Army.”

If true, questions should also be raised about the Board who must have signed off on any conflicts of interest.

> If true …

I don’t know about his investments, but one fact is clear: he was CEO of Cadence Design Systems, which has just pleaded guilty to federal charges for exporting technology to China. That alone should make him ineligible to lead a company with major government contracts.

If he resigns (and he will), the board should go with him.

Post reply on HN