Live data from Hacker News

I want everything local – Building my offline AI workspace

instavm.io

11–20 of 294 posts

Re: I want everything local – Building my offline AI workspace

#11
I'm constantly tempted by the idealism of this experience, but when you factor in the performance of the models you have access to, and the cost of running them on-demand in a cloud, it's really just a fun hobby instead of a viable strategy to benefit your life.

As the hardware continues to iterate at a rapid pace, anything you pick up second-hand will still deprecate at that pace, making any real investment in hardware unjustifiable.

Coupled with the dramatically inferior performance of the weights you would be running in a local environment, it's just not worth it.

I expect this will change in the future, and am excited to invest in a local inference stack when the weights become available. Until then, you're idling a relatively expensive, rapidly depreciating asset.

Re: I want everything local – Building my offline AI workspace

#12
post #11

I'm constantly tempted by the idealism of this experience, but when you factor in the performance of the models you have access to, and the cost of running them on-demand in a cloud, it's really just a fun hobby instead of a viable strategy to benefit your life. As the hardware continues to iterate at a rapid pace, anything you pick up second-hand will still deprecate at that pace, making any real investment in hardw…

Running LLMs at home is a repeat of the mess we make with "run a K8s cluster at home" thinking

You're not OpenAI or Google. Just use pytorch, opencv, etc to build the small models you need.

You don't need Docker even! You can share over a simple code based HTTP router app and pre-shared certs with friends.

You're recreating the patterns required to manage a massive data center in 2-3 computers in your closet. That's insane.

Re: I want everything local – Building my offline AI workspace

#13
Halfway through he gives up and uses remote models. The basic premise here is false.

Also, the term “remote code execution” in the beginning is misused. Ironically, remote code execution refers to execution of code locally - by a remote attacker. Claude Code does in fact have that, but I’m not sure if that’s what they’re referring to.

Re: I want everything local – Building my offline AI workspace

#15
That is fairly cool. I was talking about this on X yesterday: another angle however, I use a local web scraper and search engine via meilisearch the main tech web sites I am interested in. For my personal research I use three web search APIs, but there is some latency. Having a big chuck of the web that I am interested in available locally with close to zero latency is nice when running local models, my own MCP services that might need web search, etc.

Re: I want everything local – Building my offline AI workspace

#16
post #11

I'm constantly tempted by the idealism of this experience, but when you factor in the performance of the models you have access to, and the cost of running them on-demand in a cloud, it's really just a fun hobby instead of a viable strategy to benefit your life. As the hardware continues to iterate at a rapid pace, anything you pick up second-hand will still deprecate at that pace, making any real investment in hardw…

I expect it will never change. In two years if there is a local option as good as GPT-5 there will be a much better cloud option and you'll have the same tradeoffs to make.

Re: I want everything local – Building my offline AI workspace

#17
post #11

I'm constantly tempted by the idealism of this experience, but when you factor in the performance of the models you have access to, and the cost of running them on-demand in a cloud, it's really just a fun hobby instead of a viable strategy to benefit your life. As the hardware continues to iterate at a rapid pace, anything you pick up second-hand will still deprecate at that pace, making any real investment in hardw…

I expect it will never change. In two years if there is a local option as good as GPT-5 there will be a much better cloud option and you'll have the same tradeoffs to make.

Why would AI be one of the few areas where locally-hosted options can't reach "good enough"?

Re: I want everything local – Building my offline AI workspace

#18
you might want to check out what we built -> https://inference.sh supports most major open source/weight models from wan 2.2 video, qwen image, flux, most llms, hunyan 3d etc.. works in a containerized way locally by allowing you to bring your own gpu as an engine (fully free) or allows you to rent remote gpu/pool from a common cloud in case you want to run more complex models. for each model we tried to add quantized/ggufs versions to even wan2.2/qwen image/gemma become possible to execute with as little as 8gb vram gpus. mcp support coming soon in our chat interface so it can access other apps from the ecosystem.

Re: I want everything local – Building my offline AI workspace

#19
post #12
post #11

I'm constantly tempted by the idealism of this experience, but when you factor in the performance of the models you have access to, and the cost of running them on-demand in a cloud, it's really just a fun hobby instead of a viable strategy to benefit your life. As the hardware continues to iterate at a rapid pace, anything you pick up second-hand will still deprecate at that pace, making any real investment in hardw…

Running LLMs at home is a repeat of the mess we make with "run a K8s cluster at home" thinking You're not OpenAI or Google. Just use pytorch, opencv, etc to build the small models you need. You don't need Docker even! You can share over a simple code based HTTP router app and pre-shared certs with friends. You're recreating the patterns required to manage a massive data center in 2-3 computers in your closet. That's…

For me, this is essential. On priciple, I won't pay money to be a software engineer.

I never paid for cloud infrastructure out of pocket, but still became the go-to person and achieved lead architecture roles for cloud systems, because learning the FOSS/local tooling "the hard way" put me in a better position to understand what exactly my corporate employers can leverage with the big cash they pay the CSPs.

The same is shaping up in this space. Learning the nuts and bolts of wiring systems together locally with whatever Gen AI workloads it can support, and tinkering with parts of the process, is the only thing that can actually keep me interested and able to excel on this front relative to my peers who just fork out their own money to the fat cats that own billions worth of compute.

I'll continue to support efforts to keep us on the track of engineers still understanding and able to 'own' their technology from the ground up, if only at local tinkering scale

Re: I want everything local – Building my offline AI workspace

#20
post #11

I'm constantly tempted by the idealism of this experience, but when you factor in the performance of the models you have access to, and the cost of running them on-demand in a cloud, it's really just a fun hobby instead of a viable strategy to benefit your life. As the hardware continues to iterate at a rapid pace, anything you pick up second-hand will still deprecate at that pace, making any real investment in hardw…

This is especially true since AI is a large multiplicative factor to your productivity.

If Cloud LLMs have 10 IQ points > local LLM, within a month, you'll notice you'll be struggling behind the dude who just used Cloud LLM.

LocalLlama is for hobbies or your job depends on running locallama.

This is not one-time upfront setup cost vs payoff later tradeoff. It is a tradeoff you are making every query which compounds pretty quickly.

Edit : I expect nothing better than downvotes from this crowd. How HN has fallen on AI will be a case study for the ages

Post reply on HN