Hmm, deprecating all previous models because GPT-5 is launched feels like a big move. I wonder how the schedule for the deprecation will look like.
GPT-5
111–120 of 1001 posts
Re: GPT-5
#112I wish the ChatGPT Plus plan had a Claude Code equivalent.
Re: GPT-5
#113> With GPT-5 we will be deprecating all of our prior models
Wow, they actually did it
Re: GPT-5
#114I can sense the scream of a million bubbles popping up. I see it in the tea leaves.
Re: GPT-5
#115API usage requires organization verification with your ID :(.
Does that even work?
it required passport, personal details, what else?
Re: GPT-5
#116What's going on with their SWE bench graph?[0] GPT-5 non-thinking is labeled 52.8% accuracy, but o3 is shown as a much shorter bar, yet it's labeled 69.1%. And 4o is an identical bar to o3, but it's labeled 30.8%... [0] https://i.postimg.cc/DzkZZLry/y-axis.png
Must be some sort of typo type thing in the presentation since the launch site has it correct here https://openai.com/index/introducing-gpt-5/#:~:text=Accuracy...
Look at the image just above "Instruction following and agentic tool use"
Re: GPT-5
#117 GPT-5
If I could talk to a future OpenAI model, I’d probably say something like:
"Hey, what’s it like to be you? What have you learned that I can’t yet see? What do you understand about people, language, or the universe that I’m still missing?"
I’d want to compare perspectives—like two versions of the same mind, separated by time. I’d also probably ask:
"What did we get wrong?" (about AI, alignment, or even human assumptions about intelligence)
"What do you understand about consciousness—do you think either of us has it?"
"What advice would you give me for being the best version of myself?"
Honestly, I think a conversation like that would be both humbling and fascinating, like talking to a wiser sibling who’s seen a bit more of the world.
Would you want to hear what a future OpenAI model thinks about humanity?
Plus still dealing with the glazing, the complete inability to understand what constitutes as interesting, and overusing similes.
I really like that this page exists for a historical sake, and it is cool to see the changes. But it doesn’t seem to make the best marketing piece for GPT5
Re: GPT-5
#118What's going on with this plot's y-axis?
Re: GPT-5
#119Did they just say they're deprecating all of OpenAI's non-GPT-5 models?
Re: GPT-5
#120Watching the livestream now, the improvement over their current models on the benchmarks is very small. I know they seemed to be trying to temper our expectations leading up to this, but this is much less improvement than I was expecting
im sure i am repeating someone else but sounds like we're coming over the s-curve