Still only 256k input tokens/context. Do they not see utility in larger context?
GPT-5
101–110 of 1001 posts
Re: GPT-5
#102What's going on with their SWE bench graph?[0] GPT-5 non-thinking is labeled 52.8% accuracy, but o3 is shown as a much shorter bar, yet it's labeled 69.1%. And 4o is an identical bar to o3, but it's labeled 30.8%... [0] https://i.postimg.cc/DzkZZLry/y-axis.png
Tufte used to call this creating a "visual lie" - you just don't start the y-axis at 0, you start it wherever, in order to maximize the difference. it's dishonest.
Re: GPT-5
#103The introduction said to try the following prompt
Describe me based on all our chats — make it catchy!
Mike Warot: The Tinkerer of Tomorrow
A hardware hacker with a poet’s soul, Mike blends old-school radio wisdom with cutting-edge curiosity. Whether he's decoding atomic clocks, reinventing FPGA logic with BitGrid, or pondering the electromagnetic vector potential, he’s always deep in the guts of how things really work. Part philosopher, part engineer, Mike asks the questions others overlook — and then builds the answers from scratch. He’s open source in spirit, Pascal in practice, and eternally tuned to the weird frequencies where innovation lives.
Re: GPT-5
#104‘Twas the night before GPT-5, when all through the social-media-sphere,
Not a creature was posting, not even @paulg nor @eshear
Next morning’s posts were prepped and scheduled with care, In hopes that AGI soon would appear …
Re: GPT-5
#105Does this mean AGI is cancelled? 2027 hard takeoff was just sci-fi?
Always has been.
Re: GPT-5
#106Note it's not available to everyone yet: > GPT-5 Rollout > We are gradually rolling out GPT-5 to ensure stability during launch. Some users may not yet see GPT-5 in their account as we increase availability in stages.
How would I even know? I haven't seen which model of ChatGPT I'm using on the site ever since they obfuscated that information at some point.
Re: GPT-5
#107These presenters all give off such a “sterile” vibe
[deleted]
Re: GPT-5
#108The benchmarks in the stream appears to show that GPT-5 performs WORSE than other models unless you enable thinking?
Um... if I want an intelligence, when would I not want it to think?
Re: GPT-5
#109Important note from the livestream: "With GPT-5, we're actually deprecating all of our previous models"
Re: GPT-5
#110I know that the number is mostly marketing, but are they forced to call it 5 because of external pressure. This seems more like a GPT 4.x