Hacker News Board Hacker News, browsed like a classic message board
Live data from Hacker News

Windows XP Professional

win32.run

Post reply on HN
Print view View original

61–70 of 227 posts

Re: Windows XP Professional

#61

Post by accrual »

dijit wrote: post #52
devnull3 wrote: post #40

Win XP remains my favourite OS till date. I was in college and getting hands on a pirated copy back then makes me so nostalgic. There was a cambrian explosion of tools to customize the look and feel. TweakXP pro is the one I remember. All pirated off-course.

I remember being extremely envious of the "Alienware theme" that you could only get with an actual Alienware machine. That was surprisingly short-lived though, such custom experiences are uncommon these days. Seems like nobody is theming Windows- they just fill it with crapware.

I remember those themes - the sleek "glowing" blue accents on shiny silver and black UI elements looked so fancy back then. There was a Windows Media Player skin too if I recall correctly.

Re: Windows XP Professional

#62

Post by stronglikedan »

mmastrac wrote: post #17

How can you tell that any Windows or Mac clone UI is a re-implementation? Easy: try to move your mouse diagonally into the Send To menu after letting it pop up. If the send-to menu closes as you mouse over the item into the submenu, it's a clone. If the menu stays up even if you brush over another menu item, it's either real or a Good Clone. :) For the fun history, @DonHopkins had a thread a few years back: https://n…

If you have another option with a submenu on either side of Send To, the Send To menu will close. It closes as soon as you move over any item with a submenu. But it just so happens that Send To is typically by itself, so it's a good test regardless.

Re: Windows XP Professional

#63

Post by thecosmicfrog »

"WIN32.RUN might have unexpected behaviors on browsers that are NOT Chromium-based (Safari, Firefox, Internet Explorer, etc.)"

What would be the reasons this wouldn't run on Firefox? Genuine question from a non-web developer.

Re: Windows XP Professional

#64

Post by accrual »

ch_123 wrote: post #45

I feel slightly ashamed that I spent enough time using Windows XP that was able to spot that this was a clone based on the fonts and shadow effects alone. Nice effort though.

It could be a badge of honor! You used the system so much that clones can't fool you. To be fair, Windows text rendering does have a very specific look that's difficult to perfectly replicate without using the actual Windows APIs.

I'm sure some here could look at a screenshot of the same text rendered on Windows, macOS, and Linux and tell them apart.

Re: Windows XP Professional

#65

Post by okincilleb »

This is awesome! I recreated Win XP for my personal website a few years ago (https://www.sohailsayed.com/), but this completely blows it out the water on functionality.

I absolutely love just how much depth there is to the functionality in this (from being able to use apps like word, or being able to drag and move around icons on desktop).

Brilliant!

Re: Windows XP Professional

#66

Post by accrual »

benbristow wrote: post #32

So close that Microsoft Edge's heuristics picked it up as a potential scam after being used for a bit!

Wow, did you get some kind of notification in Edge? Maybe they're trying to detect certain remote desktop sessions used in scams or something.

Re: Windows XP Professional

#67

Post by tetris11 »

thecosmicfrog wrote: post #63

"WIN32.RUN might have unexpected behaviors on browsers that are NOT Chromium-based (Safari, Firefox, Internet Explorer, etc.)" What would be the reasons this wouldn't run on Firefox? Genuine question from a non-web developer.

it's not an emulator -- it's a (very realistic) re-implementation of the desktop using standard JS and CSS. Flash is run through Ruffle. Edge opens pages using native iframes.

Essentially the browser split comes from the usual browser split: discrepancies in JS and CSS implementations

Re: Windows XP Professional

#68

Post by zamadatix »

yakz wrote: post #36
sangeeth96 wrote: post #26

Real thing is possible on https://copy.sh/v86/ I think but need an XP disk image[1], not readily available at the moment (probably for copyright reasons?). [1]: https://github.com/copy/v86/issues/86

Windows 2000 in a JS VM is available: https://bellard.org/jslinux/

Windows 2000 is also available in the above (with more pre-installed apps).

Re: Windows XP Professional

#69

Post by accrual »

ferguess_k wrote: post #10

Both the OS and Word 2003 run smoothly. It's quite a show. I think I might want to keep an old 16GB RAM laptop to run Windows 7, MS Office 2010 and VS 2012. I'll cut off as much Internet as possible and concentrate on my projects. Edit : Just realized that this is not a VM, just a replicate. No wonder Word 2003 looks weird.

It is still nice to use old versions of Office. I think 2003 was my favorite. Simple, usable, no usage-based UI, no pop-ups like "look at this new feature we silently installed!" while you're trying to write.

Re: Windows XP Professional

#70

Post by benbristow »

accrual wrote: post #66
benbristow wrote: post #32

So close that Microsoft Edge's heuristics picked it up as a potential scam after being used for a bit!

Wow, did you get some kind of notification in Edge? Maybe they're trying to detect certain remote desktop sessions used in scams or something.

Yes. It's the new AI powered Scareware blocker.

https://blogs.windows.com/msedgedev/2025/01/27/stand-up-to-s...

Post reply on HN