Live data from Hacker News

AWS European Sovereign Cloud to be operated by EU citizens

aboutamazon.eu

81–88 of 88 posts

Re: AWS European Sovereign Cloud to be operated by EU citizens

#81
post #80

Earlier quoted context omitted.

That would be illegal. They are offering this service to EU governments (and government contractors) under contractual terms which promise EU management. Replacing the EU management with a US manager would at a minimum be a breach of contract - and since some of these contracts are for sensitive / national security use cases, possibly much more serious legal consequences than just garden variety breach of contract

> Replacing the EU management with a US manager would at a minimum be a breach of contract - and since some of these contracts are for sensitive / national security use cases, possibly much more serious legal consequences than just garden variety breach of contract and the EU has no leverage to do anything about it if they did they wouldn't have selected AWS "Sovereign" cloud in the first place

> and the EU has no leverage to do anything about it

Absolutely they do have leverage – maximum they could possibly do would be confiscate Amazon's EU assets (physical, financial, corporate and intellectual)

Re: AWS European Sovereign Cloud to be operated by EU citizens

#82
post #4

But it's still ultimately supporting a US company. The world needs a diversity of companies not just subsidiaries of the same few US companies.

True. Someone should look into why all these companies tend to be started in the US, and not in the EU.

The US has an excess of money due to the long-term consequences of the Bretton Woods system: it gets to export the externalities of its money printing to the whole world, so it gets to print a lot more money than other countries. That's combined with an amplification effect, because investor money tends to go to the places that have lots of money that could potentially be the investor's return.

Re: AWS European Sovereign Cloud to be operated by EU citizens

#83
post #80

Earlier quoted context omitted.

That would be illegal. They are offering this service to EU governments (and government contractors) under contractual terms which promise EU management. Replacing the EU management with a US manager would at a minimum be a breach of contract - and since some of these contracts are for sensitive / national security use cases, possibly much more serious legal consequences than just garden variety breach of contract

> Replacing the EU management with a US manager would at a minimum be a breach of contract - and since some of these contracts are for sensitive / national security use cases, possibly much more serious legal consequences than just garden variety breach of contract and the EU has no leverage to do anything about it if they did they wouldn't have selected AWS "Sovereign" cloud in the first place

The EU has no leverage?

This is located within the EU. They can walk in and arrest the US manager or deport them immediately, and throw any direct reports in jail if they obey the US manager.

The EU has all the leverage here. Sovereignty over a geographical area does actually mean something.

Re: AWS European Sovereign Cloud to be operated by EU citizens

#84
post #80

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> Replacing the EU management with a US manager would at a minimum be a breach of contract - and since some of these contracts are for sensitive / national security use cases, possibly much more serious legal consequences than just garden variety breach of contract and the EU has no leverage to do anything about it if they did they wouldn't have selected AWS "Sovereign" cloud in the first place

> and the EU has no leverage to do anything about it Absolutely they do have leverage – maximum they could possibly do would be confiscate Amazon's EU assets (physical, financial, corporate and intellectual)

> maximum they could possibly do would be confiscate Amazon's EU assets

so they can turn off their own critical services?

threatening to shoot yourself in the foot with a tactical nuke is not leverage

Re: AWS European Sovereign Cloud to be operated by EU citizens

#85
post #80

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> Replacing the EU management with a US manager would at a minimum be a breach of contract - and since some of these contracts are for sensitive / national security use cases, possibly much more serious legal consequences than just garden variety breach of contract and the EU has no leverage to do anything about it if they did they wouldn't have selected AWS "Sovereign" cloud in the first place

The EU has no leverage? This is located within the EU. They can walk in and arrest the US manager or deport them immediately, and throw any direct reports in jail if they obey the US manager. The EU has all the leverage here. Sovereignty over a geographical area does actually mean something.

> They can walk in and arrest the US manager or deport them immediately,

how? they'd be in the US (hence "US manager")

> The EU has all the leverage here.

it has one threat: to shut it all down, at which point the EU re-enters the dark ages

threatening to blow off your own leg is not leverage

Re: AWS European Sovereign Cloud to be operated by EU citizens

#87
post #84

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> and the EU has no leverage to do anything about it Absolutely they do have leverage – maximum they could possibly do would be confiscate Amazon's EU assets (physical, financial, corporate and intellectual)

> maximum they could possibly do would be confiscate Amazon's EU assets so they can turn off their own critical services? threatening to shoot yourself in the foot with a tactical nuke is not leverage

Confiscating a subsidiary doesn't shut down its computer systems.

That would require humans to do additional – and very likely criminal – acts of retaliation.

Re: AWS European Sovereign Cloud to be operated by EU citizens

#88
post #84

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> maximum they could possibly do would be confiscate Amazon's EU assets so they can turn off their own critical services? threatening to shoot yourself in the foot with a tactical nuke is not leverage

Confiscating a subsidiary doesn't shut down its computer systems. That would require humans to do additional – and very likely criminal – acts of retaliation.

At the point someone has seized an Amazon subsidiary, of course ACLs will change, equipment will get shutdown, etc.

And no one will care about whatever claims of ‘criminal retaliation’ there are, because it’s already crossed that line eh?

It’s not like the domestic employees will be doing it anyway - or would need to be involved.

Post reply on HN