19% of California houses are owned by investors
ocregister.com
19% of California houses are owned by investors
1–10 of 185 posts
Re: 19% of California houses are owned by investors
#2[deleted]
Re: 19% of California houses are owned by investors
#3[flagged]
Re: 19% of California houses are owned by investors
#4That 19% excludes buildings/subdivisions specifically built to be rental units.
Re: 19% of California houses are owned by investors
#5Re: 19% of California houses are owned by investors
#6[deleted]
Re: 19% of California houses are owned by investors
#7... and by the looks of it that's lower than (or as low as) any other state.
Re: 19% of California houses are owned by investors
#8That 19% excludes buildings/subdivisions specifically built to be rental units.
Those aren't houses, typically
Re: 19% of California houses are owned by investors
#9[flagged]
How many generations does it take before someone counts as a "real american"? Or is your "foreign-born" designation hiding that it was always about skin color all along?
Re: 19% of California houses are owned by investors
#10For anyone who didn't click into the article, the headline may be misleading without the sub headline, which currently is "Relatively speaking, California is not a hot spot for housing investors". The map graphic shows that 19% is lower than other large states (e.g. 22% in Texas, 21% in Florida, 20% in New York). And lower than other west coast states generally (22% in Washington and Oregon, 25% in Nevada, and 23% in Arizona).