Good context leads to good code: How we built an AI-Native Eng Culture
1–4 of 4 posts
Re: Good context leads to good code: How we built an AI-Native Eng Culture
#2I know the HackerNews crowd is anti-AI in the workforce overall, but I wanted to share a different approach which is optimizing for collaboration between humans and AI. This maps into certain practical things you can do, including things like how you structure your repo.
Re: Good context leads to good code: How we built an AI-Native Eng Culture
#3Re: Good context leads to good code: How we built an AI-Native Eng Culture
#4Thanks for the article, very insightful! I’m researching dev + AI workflows to build something to improve them. In your view, what’s the right granularity for storing and reusing context: A long file with lots of context per project? A small file with small bits of context per task? something in-between? And what type of context is useful for most workflows: stylistic preferences, intent, tech stack? Curious to know…
Intent is important, but so are goals, and I see the context as something that you collaboratively build with you filling in the gaps in the context the agent doesn't see.
It's almost like you repetitively ask the question: based on how the agent is behaving, what is the context I should add to help it perform better? If it's screwing up how to use an API, then I should ask it to read the docs and create a guide for itself or provide it with an llms.txt.