Live data from Hacker News

Job-seekers are dodging AI interviewers

fortune.com

601–610 of 918 posts

Re: Job-seekers are dodging AI interviewers

#601

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Guns are useless. Everyone who believes guns are some kind of savior or last-ditch protector is fucking stupid. There is a reason why, during westward expansion, the first thing towns did when they got two nickels to rub together to buy bricks to build a church was ban guns. There are so many real-world examples of guns being useless that it defies logic and belief that people cling to the myth. There are so few exam…

The United States Military is the most terrifying institution of force in the history of the human race (history of the universe as far as we know). It achieves a level of training, discipline, organization, morale, combat effectiveness and general formidavlbility that makes the median Marine among the best soldiers on the planet anywhere, all backed by a logistical apparatus unrivaled by any conceivable combination…

I mean sure but also very few of Talibs who first faced the US military had lived to see its withdrawal.

Re: Job-seekers are dodging AI interviewers

#602

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Guns are useless. Everyone who believes guns are some kind of savior or last-ditch protector is fucking stupid. There is a reason why, during westward expansion, the first thing towns did when they got two nickels to rub together to buy bricks to build a church was ban guns. There are so many real-world examples of guns being useless that it defies logic and belief that people cling to the myth. There are so few exam…

The United States Military is the most terrifying institution of force in the history of the human race (history of the universe as far as we know). It achieves a level of training, discipline, organization, morale, combat effectiveness and general formidavlbility that makes the median Marine among the best soldiers on the planet anywhere, all backed by a logistical apparatus unrivaled by any conceivable combination…

That's not true at all. Afghanistan was occupied for 20 years until the US decided to pull out, because nation building didn't work there. That's not a military failure.

Re: Job-seekers are dodging AI interviewers

#603
post #112
post #86

Earlier quoted context omitted.

whatever [...] they think will eliminate the need to hire people, will provide instead the problem is that whose who do that thinking want to enrich themselves and not provide for others. if that doesn't work, then they won't do it. so the question is, how do we get from the current situation to this life of abundance without letting the majority of people suffer in the transition. because that is hat will happen if…

> the problem is that whose who do that thinking want to enrich themselves and not provide for others. That might be your problem, but isn't the problem being discussed. > so the question is, how do we get from the current situation to this life of abundance without letting the majority of people suffer in the transition. The question is, from the perspective of what is being discussed, who cares? "I got mine" applie…

> labor is what they most have to offer, so that is what they will trade

What will they eat? Whose land might they be allowed to grow their food on?

Re: Job-seekers are dodging AI interviewers

#604
post #57

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Direct trading kind of died out towards the end of middle age, are we supposed to go back in time?

wait-- do you have historical evidence that "money" replaced "direct trading" at any point in time? Why do you pick "end of middle age" suggest reading Debt: the first 5000 years.

Never mind history. There is no evidence of "money" replacing "direct trading" today, so there would be no need to go back in time. But obviously it wasn't meant to be taken so literally. The "between the lines" intent is understood.

Re: Job-seekers are dodging AI interviewers

#605

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Chinese socialism is interesting and I think works quite well. Absolutely new stuff is basically unrestricted. Go build, have fun, make money. Intermediate stuff is partially state controlled, including cost, profits, pollution, and more. Essentials are effectively state owned, cost controlled, and 'very stable'. Also, the USSR was the first time it was tried. It succeeded some ways, but failed in others.

At the cost of the majority in rural areas living so far below what any modern country considers poverty that it’s hard to articulate. But sure. If you’re in Shenzhen or Shanghai it works «great». Until you step out of line ever so slightly.

China got all of those rural folks out of extreme poverty too.

Re: Job-seekers are dodging AI interviewers

#606

> Still, stretched-thin HR teams say it’s the only way to handle thousands of applicants. You're doing it wrong if you're considering "thousands" of applicants. First of all ask your current good employees if they can refer anyone. If you need to go to resumes, sort by qualifications. Screen out obvious robo-applications, you know them when you see them just like you know spam email from the subject line alone. Hint:…

Related: Funnily enough I’ve been getting a ton from robo applications who prepend a whole page with ascii art declaring that this is a robot application and the applicant (whose CV follows) is a “great match” and that I should reach out to the ai application mill with feedback. Naturally those are straight to the bin, but it’s just insane.

Re: Job-seekers are dodging AI interviewers

#607
post #114
post #89

I did one of these once. Once . I felt so bad afterwards that I swore them off forever. It's not like the 'interview' was terrible or anything. I knew it was AI from the start. It was just that when I got done with it, I realized that I had talked at a computer for ~45 minutes. And, yet again, I was going to be ghosted by the company (I was), and that I was never going to get those 45 minutes back. That was time I co…

Somehow i would rather stay homeless or prostitute myself than throwing my dignity away by letting an a.i. assess me over the whole job interview. Yet this is where we are heading. Being graded by openai (and co). Iris scanned by openai. Who knows what comes next..

I'm feeling similarly about reCaptchas. Why the fuck do we let computers decide if we're human enough? I'm not going to jump through those kind of hoops again.

Re: Job-seekers are dodging AI interviewers

#608
Personally, my feeling is that the median job application process was always this absurd, and the difference is only that the AI interviewer 1) is more obviously absurd, and 2) helps subject only the candidate to this huge waste of time, saving the interviewer from it. Which I guess also shows some disrespect for the candidate's time.

Job interviews are bad. It was always necessary to proactively seek out opportunities, network, and not just send lots of job apps... and obviously here I have to quote Patrick McKenzie who calls cold job apps "an effective strategy for job searching if you enjoy alternating bouts of being unemployed, being poorly compensated, and then treated like a disposable peon."[1]

Many people are super desperate and short on time, though, and in that case I guess you should suck it up and do it unless you think the time is more efficiently spent elsewhere. Which it totally may be, if there are tons of people getting "interviewed" and your chances are low.

[1]: https://www.kalzumeus.com/2012/01/23/salary-negotiation/

Re: Job-seekers are dodging AI interviewers

#610

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I think you just wrote the epitaph for the human race.

Maybe we should have written that on the Voyager Golden Record, although anyone capable of picking it up and deciphering it would have probably already avoided the scenario that doomed us.

"Third planet of this Class G star dominated by psychotic tool-using apes. Stay away."
Post reply on HN