Earlier quoted context omitted.
Would be nice to see executions of corporations as punishment.
> Would be nice to see executions of corporations as punishment Fines. Massive fines. "Corporate death penalty" is a genius invention of corporate lawyers to distract from the punitive effect of massive fines. Fines and license revocable are precedented. They take real money from the corporation and its owners. Corporate death penalties are a legal morass that doesn’t actually punish shareholders, it just cancels a l…
Tesla must pay portion of $329M damages after fatal Autopilot crash, jury says
121–130 of 286 posts
Re: Tesla must pay portion of $329M damages after fatal Autopilot crash, jury says
#122I dont understand this at all. Mercedes recently announced that theyd be liable for accidentals caused by their level 4 system meaning that by default, all other self driving features are driver liable?
https://www.kbb.com/car-advice/level-3-autonomy-what-car-buy...
https://cars.usnews.com/cars-trucks/features/mercedes-level-...
> Mercedes Chief Technology Officer Markus Schäfer recently told Automotive News that Level 4 autonomy is "doable" by 2030.
Re: Tesla must pay portion of $329M damages after fatal Autopilot crash, jury says
#123Earlier quoted context omitted.
Would be nice to see executions of corporations as punishment.
Perhaps better to achieve symmetry by ceasing to execute humans. You're never going to make executing the wrong corporation as thoroughly wicked as the numerous occasions on which we've executed the wrong human, so you can't make the scores even but you can stop putting more on the total for human misery. Historically it was impractical to permanently warehouse large number of humans, death was more practical = but t…
What if we garnished 100% of the future wages of all the employees in perpetuity as well as dissolving the corporate entity? You know, to to make sure the company stays all the way dead.
Re: Tesla must pay portion of $329M damages after fatal Autopilot crash, jury says
#124The articles has been updated (correction) to say Tesla is liable for a portion of the damages. Not all of it. 33% liable https://www.cnbc.com/2025/08/01/tesla-must-pay-329-million-i...
Re: Tesla must pay portion of $329M damages after fatal Autopilot crash, jury says
#125Earlier quoted context omitted.
I agree that Tesla should receive punitive damages. And the size of the punitive damages must be enough to discourage bad behavior. I'm not necessarily sure the victim(s) should get all of the punitive damages. $329 million is a gargantuan sum of money; it "feels" wrong to give a corporation-sized punishment to a small group of individuals. I could certainly see some proportion going toward funding regulatory agencie…
>> it "feels" wrong to give a corporation-sized punishment to a small group of individuals This feeling has a name; loss aversion. It's a really interesting human traits. About 66% of people feel bad when someone else does well. The impact of this feeling on behavior (even behavior that is self-harming) is instructive. The concept of "Fairness" comes into play as well. Many people have an expectation that the "world…
Re: Tesla must pay portion of $329M damages after fatal Autopilot crash, jury says
#126Earlier quoted context omitted.
> Would be nice to see executions of corporations as punishment Fines. Massive fines. "Corporate death penalty" is a genius invention of corporate lawyers to distract from the punitive effect of massive fines. Fines and license revocable are precedented. They take real money from the corporation and its owners. Corporate death penalties are a legal morass that doesn’t actually punish shareholders, it just cancels a l…
Corporate fines are a genius invention of corporate execs' personal lawyers to distract from the fact that all corporate malfeasance is conducted by actual people who could be held accountable.
Ahistoric and orthogonal. Corporate fines and personal sanctions have coëxisted since corporations were a thing. Charter revocations, on the other hand, have almost always followed individual liability, because again, just poofing a corporation doesn't actually do anything to its assets, the part with actual value. (In the English world, corporations frequently came pinned with trade charters. The actual punishment was losing a trade monopoly. Not a legal fiction being dissolved.)
Nothing about corporate death penalties or corporate fines prevents personal liability. And neither particularly promotes it, either, particularly if guilt is never acknowledged as part of the proceedings.
Re: Tesla must pay portion of $329M damages after fatal Autopilot crash, jury says
#127Earlier quoted context omitted.
The argument is that if the driver was in a different vehicle he would have done just that, pulled over and picked it up, but because he believed the Tesla was capable of driving safely on it's own he didn't do so. Normally I turn the steering wheel when I want to turn my car. If you sold me a car and told me it had technology to make turns automatically without my input then I might let go of the wheel instead of tu…
Except driver already accepted liability. Also this doesn't stand water today as all new cars have some basic autosteer.
Re: Tesla must pay portion of $329M damages after fatal Autopilot crash, jury says
#128> The company must pay $329 million in damages to victims and survivor, including compensatory and punitive damages. > A Tesla owner named George McGee was driving his Model S electric sedan while using the company’s Enhanced Autopilot, a partially automated driving system. > While driving, McGee dropped his mobile phone that he was using and scrambled to pick it up. He said during the trial that he believed Enhanced…
329 million too high? if you had the money and handing it over would save your life, would you rather keep the money as a corpse?
Re: Tesla must pay portion of $329M damages after fatal Autopilot crash, jury says
#129Earlier quoted context omitted.
$300M means very little to Tesla. The stock didn't even drop a bit (other than the usual market fluctuations today). Perhaps $4.20B or $6.90B would've been meaningful. Elon notices these numbers.
Not doing what it asks - “keep your hands on the wheel” and “eyes on the road” - and crashing the car is somehow Elon Musks’ fault LOL hn logic. Can’t wait to sue lane assist when I drive drunk and crash!
Re: Tesla must pay portion of $329M damages after fatal Autopilot crash, jury says
#130Earlier quoted context omitted.
It's not assistive features in general that are the problem. It's that level 3 self-drive (which is what Tesla purports to have) should not be permitted to exist. Things which simply help the driver, fine. Lane assist, adaptive cruise control and other such things that remove some of the workload but still leave the driver with the full responsibility of control. That's level 2. Level 3 can generally run the car but…
You probably should have read the article because this lawsuit is specifically about the product that you just said is "fine."