Earlier quoted context omitted.
I don’t know what you’re trying to imply, but it’s no mystery why certain institutions start functioning this poorly. It’s because there are no consequences for slow or poor performance. The people who want to do a good job get fed up and leave. The people who just want paychecks and no consequences stay. It’s not a mystery.
Ok, I'll have to call bullshit on every level of that rationale. - Those people are not doing teamwork. People (competent or not) don't leave good jobs just because some random coworker is lazy. - Even if they were doing teamwork, hardworking incompetent team members are the ones that make life hard for everybody else, not lazy ones. - Those people are not reaping any concrete benefit from being lazy. Being forced to…
I don’t know what you’re arguing at this point. I’m not talk about people sitting in a chair doing nothing.
> - I really doubt the people in question actually face "no consequences" and are not threatened all the time. That almost never happens in practice.
Are you just rejecting the existence of this situation because you don’t believe it?
I really don’t understand what you’re trying to even imply. I have anecdotes about different offices that accomplish the same exact task, but one was run very well and the other was not the slightest bit interested in running well. If you’re just choosing not to believe that a DMV office could be run poorly then I don’t know what to say, other than this conversation is going nowhere.