Complete silence is always hallucinated as "ترجمة نانسي قنقر" in Arabic

Post by xigoi » Tue, Jul 22, 2025, 9:59 AM UTC

samrus wrote: post #62

wongarsu wrote: post #48

Earlier quoted context omitted.

And the German is “subtitles of [public broadcaster] for [content network], 2017 I'm not sure this is really overfitting, the network does exactly what the training data demands. According to the training data silence art the end transcribes to a copyright notice or subtitle credits

fitting on noise in the training data is exactly what overfitting is. underfitting is smoothing out signal

Post by 0points » Tue, Jul 22, 2025, 10:03 AM UTC

d1sxeyes wrote: post #89

jdiff wrote: post #45

Earlier quoted context omitted.

That's the magic of money. Download your favorite artist's discography for personal use? If the MPAA had its way (and it occasionally has), torrenting that could bankrupt you. The AI industry - soaking up every bit of media available online for commercial purposes, often reproducing it nearly identically - has enough money and capital to influence things its way. And only its way, in case anyone was hoping this might…

> Download your favorite artist's discography for personal use? If the MPAA had its way (and it occasionally has), torrenting that could bankrupt you. I don't think that there are any clear examples of cases where ONLY downloading has resulted in huge fines. All the big bankrupting level fines have been for both downloading and sharing. You mention that 'torrenting' could bankrupt you, and that is true, but the main…

Post by andrepd » Tue, Jul 22, 2025, 10:07 AM UTC

wongarsu wrote: post #48

hsn915 wrote: post #33

Earlier quoted context omitted.

ُThe Arabic text is the translator's self credit "Translated by Nancy Qanfar"

And the German is “subtitles of [public broadcaster] for [content network], 2017 I'm not sure this is really overfitting, the network does exactly what the training data demands. According to the training data silence art the end transcribes to a copyright notice or subtitle credits

Post by 0points » Tue, Jul 22, 2025, 10:11 AM UTC

berkes wrote: post #83

nottorp wrote: post #58

Title should be changed to "OpenAI publishes evidence they trained on pirated movies".

How is this evidence of that fact? Honest question. I can see how this might show that subtitles from online sub communities are used, or that maybe even original subtitles from e.g. DVDs are used. But isn't it already known and admitted (and allowed?) that AI uses all sorts of copyrighted material to train models?

Post by skeezyboy » Tue, Jul 22, 2025, 10:22 AM UTC

0points wrote: post #117

berkes wrote: post #83

Earlier quoted context omitted.

How is this evidence of that fact? Honest question. I can see how this might show that subtitles from online sub communities are used, or that maybe even original subtitles from e.g. DVDs are used. But isn't it already known and admitted (and allowed?) that AI uses all sorts of copyrighted material to train models?

> I can see how this might show that subtitles from online sub communities are used, or that maybe even original subtitles from e.g. DVDs are used. Indeed, the captioning is copyrighted work and you are not legally allowed to copy and redistribute it. > But isn't it already known and admitted (and allowed?) No, and I don't see where you got that from. Meta [1], OpenAI [2] and everybody else is being sued as we speak.…