Live data from Hacker News

Show HN: Most Wikipedia articles lead to the same loop

wikiloopr.com

141–150 of 171 posts

Re: Show HN: Most Wikipedia articles lead to the same loop

#141

Earlier quoted context omitted.

So did you edit Wikipedia to ensure the Philosophy loop?

Yes.

Now it loops between "Human" and "Reason". I think there are two secret cabals at work. One to break the Philosophy link and one to thwart these evil schemes.

Re: Show HN: Most Wikipedia articles lead to the same loop

#142
post #55
post #38

Either philosophy is a dead end, then, or it is the base of all knowledge. Depends on whether knowledge is a tree or a graph, which is... a philosophical question! My brain exploded.

If there is some characteristic Q that is true of all knowledge, then Q must be true of Q. A cycle!

Only if Q is knowable.

Re: Show HN: Most Wikipedia articles lead to the same loop

#145
post #39

From a mathematical perspective, this is actually not that surprising. Think of the act of clicking the first link in the Wikipedia article as a function that takes in the page you're on and outputs another page. If you call this function on itself over and over again (ie use the output of one step as in the input of the next step), you will eventually enter a loop. The proof of this is simple: there are only a finit…

Unless an article is reached that has no link. [A dead-state in the stated finite-state machine]

Re: Show HN: Most Wikipedia articles lead to the same loop

#146
post #79
post #39

From a mathematical perspective, this is actually not that surprising. Think of the act of clicking the first link in the Wikipedia article as a function that takes in the page you're on and outputs another page. If you call this function on itself over and over again (ie use the output of one step as in the input of the next step), you will eventually enter a loop. The proof of this is simple: there are only a finit…

Agreed. I'd love to know how many different cycles the wikipedia article graph contains. If most articles lead to 1 out of 20 possible cycles, it's much less interesting than if it's 1 out of 5,000,000.

I've been looking to do something like this with the Networkx library in Python, though on an internal company MediaWiki with a much smaller article base. Going to try to visualise much the same thing, the major loops and cliques in the graph.

Re: Show HN: Most Wikipedia articles lead to the same loop

#147
post #87

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Traditionally, a university had four faculties, the lower or artists faculty, and the three higher faculties of theology, law and medicine. Students would start in the artists faculty learning the seven liberal arts (grammar, rhetoric, logic, arithmetic, geometry, music, and astronomy (including astrology)) to become a magister artium (M.A.) and then go to one of the higher faculties to get their doctorate (Th.D, LL.…

Really cool comment, I love finding interesting trivia in forums.

> 'interesting trivia'

In the above - grammar, rhetoric, logic - formed the "trivium" and - arithmetic, geometry, music, and astronomy - formed the "quadrivium".

Also "trivium" represented the place where three roads would intersect. People would meet here and exchange pleasantries and gossip. That is how you get the current meaning of the word "trivia".

Re: Show HN: Most Wikipedia articles lead to the same loop

#149
post #87

Earlier quoted context omitted.

ah so thats why the degree is called Doctor of Philosophy?! Thanks for the enlightenment! I've wondered quite a lot of times why I'm a Doctor of Philosophy in Computer Science, and not Doctor of Computer Science.

Traditionally, a university had four faculties, the lower or artists faculty, and the three higher faculties of theology, law and medicine. Students would start in the artists faculty learning the seven liberal arts (grammar, rhetoric, logic, arithmetic, geometry, music, and astronomy (including astrology)) to become a magister artium (M.A.) and then go to one of the higher faculties to get their doctorate (Th.D, LL.…

Thank you. I enjoyed reading this. Would be nice if you wrote a little blog post on the subject :)
Post reply on HN