Behind the ballistics of the 'explosive' squirting cucumber
1–10 of 14 posts
Re: Behind the ballistics of the 'explosive' squirting cucumber
#2Re: Behind the ballistics of the 'explosive' squirting cucumber
#3Re: Behind the ballistics of the 'explosive' squirting cucumber
#4My brain hurts.
But I learned a new word: mucilaginous.
Re: Behind the ballistics of the 'explosive' squirting cucumber
#5> speeds up to 29 miles per hour and reach shooting distances up to 12 meters. My brain hurts. But I learned a new word: mucilaginous.
Re: Behind the ballistics of the 'explosive' squirting cucumber
#6Wild how evolution landed on 53° as the ideal launch angle. Nature’s own ballistics optimization.
Re: Behind the ballistics of the 'explosive' squirting cucumber
#7Re: Behind the ballistics of the 'explosive' squirting cucumber
#8> speeds up to 29 miles per hour and reach shooting distances up to 12 meters. My brain hurts. But I learned a new word: mucilaginous.
This reminded me of the South American "dynamite tree" (Hura crepitans, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hura_crepitans ), which wikipedia says launches seeds from its exploding fruits at 160 mph, up to 100 ft away! A pretty menacing tree actually, its trunk covered in huge thorns and it has a poisonous sap.
Re: Behind the ballistics of the 'explosive' squirting cucumber
#9Re: Behind the ballistics of the 'explosive' squirting cucumber
#10Wild how evolution landed on 53° as the ideal launch angle. Nature’s own ballistics optimization.
I recall from school that distance is maximized for a ballistic path when the angle is 45°. See e.g. https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/football-projecti...
Did someone get confused while writing this article or is there some reason why the optimal angle would be different in this situation?