Live data from Hacker News

The current hype around autonomous agents, and what actually works in production

utkarshkanwat.com

1–10 of 268 posts

Re: The current hype around autonomous agents, and what actually works in production

#7
post #117

[stub for offtopicness]

Let's get a timer to watch this fall off the front page of HN in minutes.

"We can't allow this post to create FUD about the current hype on AI agents and we need the scam to continue as long as possible".

Re: The current hype around autonomous agents, and what actually works in production

#8
post #4
post #117

[stub for offtopicness]

This is obviously AI generated, if that matters. And I have an AI workflow that generates much better posts than this.

I think it's just written by someone who reads a lot of LLM output - lots of lists with bolded prefixes. Maybe there was some AI-assistance (or a lot), but I didn't get the impression that it was AI-generated as a whole.

Re: The current hype around autonomous agents, and what actually works in production

#9
> Production systems need 99.9%+ reliability

This is not remotely true. Think of any business process around your company. 99.9% availability would mean only 1min26 per day allowed for instability/errors/downtime. Surely your human collaborators aren't hitting this SLA. A single coffee break immediately breaks this (per collaborator!).

Business Process Automation via AI doesn't need to be perfect. It simply needs to be sufficiently better than the status quo to pay for itself.

Re: The current hype around autonomous agents, and what actually works in production

#10
post #3

> Each new interaction requires processing ALL previous context I was under the impression that some kind of caching mechanism existed to mitigate this

Caching would only help to keep the context around, but caching would only be needed if it still ultimately needs to read and process that cached context again.
Post reply on HN