Earlier quoted context omitted.
The average employee there certainly takes less home per year and also pays a hefty income tax.
Income tax is irrelevant to Google's cost. So is take-home pay to some extent. I'm not sure what you're getting at.
Close, but no cigar
Take home pay should be competitive with other companies and guarantee a certain standard of living
So salaries are higher for a competitive take home pay. But the lower corporate tax ends up making things even.
I was only saying the value mentioned by the parent was off, that's all.