Live data from Hacker News

Show HN: Most Wikipedia articles lead to the same loop

wikiloopr.com

51–60 of 171 posts

Re: Show HN: Most Wikipedia articles lead to the same loop

#54

This may be hyper naive but is this the consequence of beginning most articles representing the current topic as a more specific form of another topic? For example: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Algebra "Algebra ... is a branch of mathematics." (mathematics being a link) So if you continue to generalize you'll end up at the most general subject which appears to be philosophy. [update] added an example

That seems like a very reasonable assumption. I just randomly sampled a dozen or so articles and they all followed that theme.

Re: Show HN: Most Wikipedia articles lead to the same loop

#55
post #38

Either philosophy is a dead end, then, or it is the base of all knowledge. Depends on whether knowledge is a tree or a graph, which is... a philosophical question! My brain exploded.

If there is some characteristic Q that is true of all knowledge, then Q must be true of Q. A cycle!

Re: Show HN: Most Wikipedia articles lead to the same loop

#58
What happens for Biology? http://wikiloopr.com/Biology. For me, it goes down until it gets to Biology, and then highlights Biology over and over.

  Biology
  Natural science
  Science
  Knowledge
  Fact
  Proof (truth)
  Argument
  Philosophy
  Problem
  Doubt
  Belief
  Proposition
  Logic
  Reason
  Human
  Mammal
  Class (biology)
  Biological classification
  Organism
  Biology
The first link on the Wikipedia page for Biology is "Biology(disambiguation)", but the first textual link is "Natural Science". I assume it loops on Biology because it keeps going back between Biology (the article) and Biology (disambiguation), but that doesn't explain why the first redirect is to Natural Science in the very beginning.

Am I just missing something here?

Edit: This no longer happens. Now it properly loops on Philosophy and Proposition.

Re: Show HN: Most Wikipedia articles lead to the same loop

#60
post #38

Either philosophy is a dead end, then, or it is the base of all knowledge. Depends on whether knowledge is a tree or a graph, which is... a philosophical question! My brain exploded.

Trees are connected acyclic graphs, so knowledge could be both. ;)
Post reply on HN