15,000+ AI-generated fake podcasts
kaggle.com
15,000+ AI-generated fake podcasts
1–10 of 10 posts
Re: 15,000+ AI-generated fake podcasts
#2How long before dead internet theory is for real for real
Re: 15,000+ AI-generated fake podcasts
#3Context: "This dataset represents a small subset of AI-generated fake podcasts that were flagged during attempts to add ... The goal of sharing this dataset is to ... combat spam."
Re: 15,000+ AI-generated fake podcasts
#4How long before dead internet theory is for real for real
Negative several years.
Re: 15,000+ AI-generated fake podcasts
#5I take issue with the term "fake podcast." This is like calling AI generated art "fake art."
The issue they have is with low-quality content. If the AI generated content was better than most human-created podcasts and were making their engagement numbers go up, I doubt they would be calling them fake or removing them.
Re: 15,000+ AI-generated fake podcasts
#6How long before dead internet theory is for real for real
[deleted]
Re: 15,000+ AI-generated fake podcasts
#7I take issue with the term "fake podcast." This is like calling AI generated art "fake art." The issue they have is with low-quality content. If the AI generated content was better than most human-created podcasts and were making their engagement numbers go up, I doubt they would be calling them fake or removing them.
It's fake art made by pouring a bunch of images into an algorithmic hopper and spitting out something vaguely like them without paying a single cent to anyone whose data was grabbed for this abuse of fair use, at a huge cost of power hidden away from the user.
Re: 15,000+ AI-generated fake podcasts
#8Future elections will be interesting.
It's obvious with AI/LLM these days you can very quickly create wast amounts of information that drowns out whatever is on the agenda.
Re: 15,000+ AI-generated fake podcasts
#9Future elections will be interesting. It's obvious with AI/LLM these days you can very quickly create wast amounts of information that drowns out whatever is on the agenda.
We've been there for a while. Most people get their news from social media networks that persistently funnel users into content silos that validate and reinforce their beliefs, and even traditional news outlets fall prey to biased and forced narratives all the time. Paid propagandists and bot farms have been adding noise for several years. You have to take everything with a grain of salt unless it's verifiable through citations from primary sources or references to data sources for statistical analyses, which are rare to find on news websites (although they are better at filtering out false rumors) and even rarer on popular social media networks that favor short-form text content. I feel like skepticism and critical thinking are trending in response, but that might just be my filter bubble.
Re: 15,000+ AI-generated fake podcasts
#10I take issue with the term "fake podcast." This is like calling AI generated art "fake art." The issue they have is with low-quality content. If the AI generated content was better than most human-created podcasts and were making their engagement numbers go up, I doubt they would be calling them fake or removing them.
It's fake art made by pouring a bunch of images into an algorithmic hopper and spitting out something vaguely like them without paying a single cent to anyone whose data was grabbed for this abuse of fair use, at a huge cost of power hidden away from the user.
I disagree its "fake art."
Criticize the process of creating it all you want.