61–70 of 113 posts
If it were somehow a human that was consistently and confidently handing out made up programming advice about one's products, would companies still respond by just adding whatever imagined feature and writing a vaguely bemused blog post about it?
Like… it’s just a really, really, really good autocomplete and sometimes I find thinking of it that way cleans up my whole mental model for its use.
Is there a general name and framing we could apply to these “AI” that is equally as accurate but sheds all of the human biases associated with the terms? Like… it’s just a really, really, really good autocomplete and sometimes I find thinking of it that way cleans up my whole mental model for its use.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
No, if you need to depart your lane in a hurry you cannot be expected to use the blinker first and the car should not fight you to do so
No you're most often breaking traffic laws and increasing a chance of a collision, than the off chance of needing to make such a maneuver to avoid an accident. The societal cost of collisions is worth more than your freedoms. Or you should pay higher premiums for turning those safety features off.
For all you know I need to exit my lane in a hurry to avoid a collision. The car doesn't have the same context that the driver has. It only cares about staying between two painted lines, it might not have any idea about a truck coming straight at me going the other direction
> The societal cost of collisions is worth more than your freedoms
If a semi is in my lane barrelling toward me I'm not obligated to just accept death so I don't endanger anyone else by accident by swerving to avoid it
The fact is that human drivers have a lot more information and awareness than a handful of sensors installed by idiot engineers that think the only bad thing that ever happens when driving is that someone changes lanes without signalling
I like seeing what users are currently viewing the same page, but man the constant jostling of users coming and going made it hard to read the post.
I like seeing what users are currently viewing the same page, but man the constant jostling of users coming and going made it hard to read the post.
I like seeing what users are currently viewing the same page, but man the constant jostling of users coming and going made it hard to read the post.
[0]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_HTTP_status_codes
Is there a general name and framing we could apply to these “AI” that is equally as accurate but sheds all of the human biases associated with the terms? Like… it’s just a really, really, really good autocomplete and sometimes I find thinking of it that way cleans up my whole mental model for its use.