Am I the only one who finds the Sam Altman-esque 'all lowercase except for proper nouns like Linux but not including the pronoun i' writing style unbearable to read?
You Are in a Box
61–70 of 138 posts
Re: You Are in a Box
#62Am I the only one who finds the Sam Altman-esque 'all lowercase except for proper nouns like Linux but not including the pronoun i' writing style unbearable to read?
it's pretentiousness thinly disguised as modesty. trust me.
Re: You Are in a Box
#63Earlier quoted context omitted.
Cool idea. Seems like it would require an entirely new philosophy vs our present one on security.
Yes, but it also removes a lot of footguns. Access to resources (ie. paths mostly) is controlled almost entirely by the parent process, which makes access controls highly pluggable and flexible. The real problem is Plan9 never really had a lot of attention put on the things that make having a sane security policy good. Factotum seems, at best, to be bolted on after the fact.
What gives you this impression?
Re: You Are in a Box
#64I like this post but the whole thing is a tease for an unwritten next article
lol yeah it absolutely is originally i had them both in one article but it was getting to be really quite long and i am still thinking through what i want to say in the follow-up
This little change was mind-blowing for me so I always try to share when I can :)
Re: You Are in a Box
#65Am I the only one who finds the Sam Altman-esque 'all lowercase except for proper nouns like Linux but not including the pronoun i' writing style unbearable to read?
https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html
(Of course annoyances are annoying, but they're also distracting, and they tend to get stuck at the top of threads, choking out more interesting conversation.)
Re: You Are in a Box
#66Earlier quoted context omitted.
it's pretentiousness thinly disguised as modesty. trust me.
What I find pretentious is the legion of commenters who can't find anything better to comment on and instead pretend they're smart by nitpicking some stylistic choice in the most low-effort way possible.
Re: You Are in a Box
#67Earlier quoted context omitted.
Yes, but it also removes a lot of footguns. Access to resources (ie. paths mostly) is controlled almost entirely by the parent process, which makes access controls highly pluggable and flexible. The real problem is Plan9 never really had a lot of attention put on the things that make having a sane security policy good. Factotum seems, at best, to be bolted on after the fact.
> Factotum seems, at best, to be bolted on after the fact. What gives you this impression?
Re: You Are in a Box
#68Am I the only one who finds the Sam Altman-esque 'all lowercase except for proper nouns like Linux but not including the pronoun i' writing style unbearable to read?
Tell me you didn't grow up on IRC and AIM without telling me you didn't grow up on IRC and AIM
But the topic is long-form, published content. Writing styles communicate tone, which may change culturally with generations.
Re: You Are in a Box
#69Am I the only one who finds the Sam Altman-esque 'all lowercase except for proper nouns like Linux but not including the pronoun i' writing style unbearable to read?
I'd closed the tab by the end of the first sentence. If the author can't be bothered, then neither can I. I tend to find people who do this have a superiority complex, they think they're so much better than everyone else that they're justified in offloading their own tiny cognitive load on to everybody else.
I strongly recommend rethinking that approach. You ascribed intentions to the author and then spent more time getting upset about them than you did interacting with the content.
There are actually interesting points in that text, yet here we are getting fussy about the author's supposed lack of decorum. That's really disappointing to me.