Live data from Hacker News

You Are in a Box

jyn.dev

61–70 of 138 posts

Re: You Are in a Box

#61
post #9

Am I the only one who finds the Sam Altman-esque 'all lowercase except for proper nouns like Linux but not including the pronoun i' writing style unbearable to read?

I didn't know that was a thing. It's purpose seems to be different for the sake of being different.

Re: You Are in a Box

#62
post #29
post #9

Am I the only one who finds the Sam Altman-esque 'all lowercase except for proper nouns like Linux but not including the pronoun i' writing style unbearable to read?

it's pretentiousness thinly disguised as modesty. trust me.

What I find pretentious is the legion of commenters who can't find anything better to comment on and instead pretend they're smart by nitpicking some stylistic choice in the most low-effort way possible.

Re: You Are in a Box

#63

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Cool idea. Seems like it would require an entirely new philosophy vs our present one on security.

Yes, but it also removes a lot of footguns. Access to resources (ie. paths mostly) is controlled almost entirely by the parent process, which makes access controls highly pluggable and flexible. The real problem is Plan9 never really had a lot of attention put on the things that make having a sane security policy good. Factotum seems, at best, to be bolted on after the fact.

> Factotum seems, at best, to be bolted on after the fact.

What gives you this impression?

Re: You Are in a Box

#64
post #6

I like this post but the whole thing is a tease for an unwritten next article

lol yeah it absolutely is originally i had them both in one article but it was getting to be really quite long and i am still thinking through what i want to say in the follow-up

A bit off-topic, but in a shell pipeline like that, if you put your pipe chars at the end of the line you don't need backslashes and you can comment out bits of the pipe for devving.

This little change was mind-blowing for me so I always try to share when I can :)

Re: You Are in a Box

#65
post #9

Am I the only one who finds the Sam Altman-esque 'all lowercase except for proper nouns like Linux but not including the pronoun i' writing style unbearable to read?

"Please don't complain about tangential annoyances—e.g. article or website formats, name collisions, or back-button breakage. They're too common to be interesting."

https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html

(Of course annoyances are annoying, but they're also distracting, and they tend to get stuck at the top of threads, choking out more interesting conversation.)

Re: You Are in a Box

#66
post #29

Earlier quoted context omitted.

it's pretentiousness thinly disguised as modesty. trust me.

What I find pretentious is the legion of commenters who can't find anything better to comment on and instead pretend they're smart by nitpicking some stylistic choice in the most low-effort way possible.

Classic case of "you're pretentious", "no, you're pretentious". It's exhausting how often we reach for the word "pretentious" when we have bitter feelings about one person's opinion of another person or their work.

Re: You Are in a Box

#67

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Yes, but it also removes a lot of footguns. Access to resources (ie. paths mostly) is controlled almost entirely by the parent process, which makes access controls highly pluggable and flexible. The real problem is Plan9 never really had a lot of attention put on the things that make having a sane security policy good. Factotum seems, at best, to be bolted on after the fact.

> Factotum seems, at best, to be bolted on after the fact. What gives you this impression?

It literally was, it didn't exist until the 4th edition of Plan9. That isn't to say it isn't a good idea (or implementation), but security is very clearly not a primary concern in Plan9.

Re: You Are in a Box

#68
post #54
post #9

Am I the only one who finds the Sam Altman-esque 'all lowercase except for proper nouns like Linux but not including the pronoun i' writing style unbearable to read?

Tell me you didn't grow up on IRC and AIM without telling me you didn't grow up on IRC and AIM

I did grow up on IRC and AIM. I use all-lowercase even today in text-messaging. I explicitly undo autocapitalization of "lol", and so on.

But the topic is long-form, published content. Writing styles communicate tone, which may change culturally with generations.

Re: You Are in a Box

#69
post #36
post #9

Am I the only one who finds the Sam Altman-esque 'all lowercase except for proper nouns like Linux but not including the pronoun i' writing style unbearable to read?

I'd closed the tab by the end of the first sentence. If the author can't be bothered, then neither can I. I tend to find people who do this have a superiority complex, they think they're so much better than everyone else that they're justified in offloading their own tiny cognitive load on to everybody else.

So, you barely read one sentence, then went to the comments, read an entire thread, and took the time to post about how the author probably thinks they are superior to you?

I strongly recommend rethinking that approach. You ascribed intentions to the author and then spent more time getting upset about them than you did interacting with the content.

There are actually interesting points in that text, yet here we are getting fussy about the author's supposed lack of decorum. That's really disappointing to me.

Post reply on HN