Live data from Hacker News

Bypassing Google's big anti-adblock update

0x44.xyz

271–280 of 962 posts

Re: Bypassing Google's big anti-adblock update

#271

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Can you still get real Firefox on mac? I thought they forced chromium on there now too? The only time I got MacBook I put linux on it within a few months.

macOS isn't locked down like iOS. There are things like SIP which prevent some hacking/customising of the system, but: 1. These can all be disabled by advanced users (largely without consequence) 2. They dont prevent things like installing apps or even gaining root access in the first place. The very fact that you can install Linux is evidence of the different approach taken with macs (you can't easily install Linux…

The last macbook I owned had an Ethernet port, so I wasn't sure how much had changed in the interim. I knew that had added some lockdown and I wasn't sure how much. That seems like a reasonable compromise.

Re: Bypassing Google's big anti-adblock update

#272

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Its not happening

I switched to Firefox and it's been wonderful. I wonder why I didn't switch earlier. It's only been a couple of months, but I can't imagine going back to a browser without multi-account containers.

Multi-account containers are brilliant. I recommend the following extensions:

    * uBlock Origin
    * Privacy Badger
    * Multi-Account Containers
    * Flagfox
    * Cookie Autodelete

Re: Bypassing Google's big anti-adblock update

#273
post #136

Even if bigs exists to work around what Google is doing, that isn’t the right way forward. If people don’t agree with Google move, the only correct course of action is to ditch Chrome (and all Chromium browsers). Hit them where it hurts and take away their monopoly over the future direction of the web.

A monopoly achieved thanks to everyone that forgot about IE lesson, and instead of learning Web standards, rather ships Chrome alongside their application.

Consumers never really pick products for ideological reasons, no matter how galling that is to ideologues

Re: Bypassing Google's big anti-adblock update

#275

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I switched to Firefox and it's been wonderful. I wonder why I didn't switch earlier. It's only been a couple of months, but I can't imagine going back to a browser without multi-account containers.

Multi-account containers are brilliant. I recommend the following extensions: * uBlock Origin * Privacy Badger * Multi-Account Containers * Flagfox * Cookie Autodelete

Extensions are potential sources of future vulnerabilities. The less the better.

Re: Bypassing Google's big anti-adblock update

#277
post #21

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I'd be shocked if anyone actually believes them. This article starts with the obvious conflict of interest. Of course letting an extension know what websites you visit and what requests are made is an insecure lifestyle. But I still do it because I trust uBO more than I trust the ad companies and their data harvesters.

I believe them. The restrictions are reasonable and appropriate for nearly everyone. Extensions are untrusted code that should have as little access as possible. If restrictions can be bypassed, that's a security bug that should be fixed because it directly affects users. I also think uBlock Origin is so important and trusted it should not only be an exception to the whole thing but should also be given even more acc…

I trust ublock infinitely more than anything written by Google, a literal spyware company.

Re: Bypassing Google's big anti-adblock update

#278
post #44

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Well, in his defense it would have been patched immediately after the first adblocker used it, and he would have gotten nothing at all out of it. Oh wait he got nothing at all anyway ;)

Not really, this sort of fame farming is what makes candidates stand out in infosec interviews. A bug in Google systems is good for his future career.

The post says they had another bug with a large bounty in the same year, so it doesn't seem very useful for CV padding either

Re: Bypassing Google's big anti-adblock update

#279
post #186

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The only time I've used anything but firefox for the last. Well probably since netscape honestly? I am so old. Is to get the in flight entertainment to work on american, but firefox has worked for that for a few years now. People say chrome is faster and in the early 2000s I might have agreed, but now I really don't understand why anyone not on a mac or iphone isn't using Firefox. It is great.

> I really don't understand why anyone not on a mac or iphone isn't using Firefox I'm on a mac and happily use Firefox. Have done for over a decade. It would take a lot to encourage me to move to a proprietary browser (Edge, Chrome, Safari). Maybe I'm out of touch, but the attachment to Chrome that some people seem to have (despite the outright privacy abuse) is baffling to me. I mean, ffs, are a couple of minor UI c…

They just don’t know. If you show them internet without ads they are amazed that something like that is possible.

Re: Bypassing Google's big anti-adblock update

#280
post #21
post #4

>They decided it wasn't a security issue, and honestly, I agree, because it didn't give extensions access to data they didn't already have. So they admit that MV3 isn't actually any more secure than MV2?

I'd be shocked if anyone actually believes them. This article starts with the obvious conflict of interest. Of course letting an extension know what websites you visit and what requests are made is an insecure lifestyle. But I still do it because I trust uBO more than I trust the ad companies and their data harvesters.

I've started assuming bad intent after WEI, even though it was dropped.
Post reply on HN