Earlier quoted context omitted.
Not being able to run Twitch on it has me switch for brief periods.
You're personally unable to look at twitch on it?
Bypassing Google's big anti-adblock update
121–130 of 962 posts
Re: Bypassing Google's big anti-adblock update
#122No judgement but I would love to hear from Google employees who worked on this. Do they believe they are improving the internet in any way?
Re: Bypassing Google's big anti-adblock update
#123Even if bigs exists to work around what Google is doing, that isn’t the right way forward. If people don’t agree with Google move, the only correct course of action is to ditch Chrome (and all Chromium browsers). Hit them where it hurts and take away their monopoly over the future direction of the web.
A lot of people seem to believe that switching to a de-Googled Chromium-based browser isn't good enough. I think that's a psyop promoted by Google themselves. Firefox is different enough from Chrome that it's a big jump for people who are used to Chrome. Brave, custom Chromium builds, Vivaldi, etc. are all very similar to Google Chrome, they just don't have Google spy features. The argument that "Google still control…
Re: Bypassing Google's big anti-adblock update
#124Earlier quoted context omitted.
Its not happening
I don't know, I switched to Safari and it was painful for like two hours and then I stopped thinking about it. The only thing I somewhat miss is the built-in page translate, but I don't need it often enough to be bothered much.
Re: Bypassing Google's big anti-adblock update
#125Earlier quoted context omitted.
Well, in his defense it would have been patched immediately after the first adblocker used it, and he would have gotten nothing at all out of it. Oh wait he got nothing at all anyway ;)
Would be quite different if they patched it and broke important extensions, possibly facing serieous outcry and bad publicity.
Re: Bypassing Google's big anti-adblock update
#126I'd gladly pay for YouTube without ads if I trusted that it would remain ad free, but the track record from various companies on this is not good.
I pay for YouTube premium for my family and there haven’t been any injected ads at all. Only the ones that the video themselves have in, which are also very annoying. I can’t speak for the future, but I’ve had this for probably 5 years and I haven’t seen a single ad, only the videos that I’ve asked to see.
Re: Bypassing Google's big anti-adblock update
#127I did not even realize my ublock origin was turned off. My HOST FILE script did the same service: https://expatcircle.com/cms/privacy-advanced-ublock-origin-w... More concerning is that social fixer was turned off: https://socialfixer.com/ MFGA Make Facebook Great again ;-)
Re: Bypassing Google's big anti-adblock update
#128At work I use Edge (MS integration w SSO and all). Edge has some nice features like vertical tabs and copilot. (yes, email writing with AI is nice)
We are allowed Chrome and FF so have those too with ublock on FF. Chrome is 3rd choice if a site really needs it and for testing.
Re: Bypassing Google's big anti-adblock update
#129Re: Bypassing Google's big anti-adblock update
#130Earlier quoted context omitted.
If you are a paying subscriber, you are self-identifying as (likely) a higher net-worth. The problem for ad platforms allowing paid opt-out is that the most valuable users leave the network. Then they have to go to advertisers and say, “advertise on our network where all the wealthier people are not.” A brand like Tiffany’s or Rolex (both huge advertisers) aren’t going to opt into that.
A YouTube subscription doesn’t exactly break the bank. Being able to afford it doesn’t make you wealthy. Apart from that, you can bet that YouTube is pricing it in a way that they aren’t losing out compared to ad revenue.