What’s up with wvdbozpfc.com? There’s a bunch of random looking domain names: cmidphnvq.com, rpqihexdb.com, facebook.com. I’d guess they for advertising?
Or malware, those would typically be fairly random domain names that are queried for updates or instructions by a large number of infected devices.
Top DNS domains seen on the Quad9 recursive resolver array each day
11–20 of 100 posts
Re: Top DNS domains seen on the Quad9 recursive resolver array each day
#12> https://github.com/Quad9DNS/quad9-domains-top500/blob/main/t... {"position": 5, "domain_name": "kxulsrwcq.com", "date": "2025-07-10"} What the https://www.ipaddress.com/website/kxulsrwcq.com/ > Safety/Trust: Unknown
More: {"position": 26, "domain_name": "cmidphnvq.com", "date": "2025-07-10"} {"position": 28, "domain_name": "xmqkychtb.com", "date": "2025-07-10"} {"position": 37, "domain_name": "ezdrtpvsa.com", "date": "2025-07-10"} {"position": 38, "domain_name": "wvdbozpfc.com", "date": "2025-07-10"} {"position": 46, "domain_name": "bldrdoc.gov", "date": "2025-07-10"} {"position": 52, "domain_name": "gadf99632rm.xyz", "date": "2…
Geniuses...
Re: Top DNS domains seen on the Quad9 recursive resolver array each day
#13Seems like it'd be a good addition to the Tranco list: https://tranco-list.eu/
Re: Top DNS domains seen on the Quad9 recursive resolver array each day
#14What’s up with wvdbozpfc.com? There’s a bunch of random looking domain names: cmidphnvq.com, rpqihexdb.com, facebook.com. I’d guess they for advertising?
Re: Top DNS domains seen on the Quad9 recursive resolver array each day
#15Earlier quoted context omitted.
More: {"position": 26, "domain_name": "cmidphnvq.com", "date": "2025-07-10"} {"position": 28, "domain_name": "xmqkychtb.com", "date": "2025-07-10"} {"position": 37, "domain_name": "ezdrtpvsa.com", "date": "2025-07-10"} {"position": 38, "domain_name": "wvdbozpfc.com", "date": "2025-07-10"} {"position": 46, "domain_name": "bldrdoc.gov", "date": "2025-07-10"} {"position": 52, "domain_name": "gadf99632rm.xyz", "date": "2…
bldrdoc.gov seems to be Cisco devices looking for a time server: https://community.cisco.com/t5/ipv6/cisco-switch-generating-... Geniuses...
I added it in the first place as it was a non-resolving .gov in the top 50 list which seemed out of place to me.
> bldrdoc.gov: No address associated with hostname
I see that the time related subdomains in your link do resolve to the nist.gov timeserver.
But I really am wondering what's up with all of the rest of these domains.
Re: Top DNS domains seen on the Quad9 recursive resolver array each day
#16> https://github.com/Quad9DNS/quad9-domains-top500/blob/main/t... {"position": 5, "domain_name": "kxulsrwcq.com", "date": "2025-07-10"} What the https://www.ipaddress.com/website/kxulsrwcq.com/ > Safety/Trust: Unknown
hiwd.kxulsrwcq.com is pointing to vdd.cachefly.net
I am not sure, but my guess is they might be used by some kind of a streaming service.Re: Top DNS domains seen on the Quad9 recursive resolver array each day
#17What’s up with wvdbozpfc.com? There’s a bunch of random looking domain names: cmidphnvq.com, rpqihexdb.com, facebook.com. I’d guess they for advertising?
I'd assume the domains change regularly if it's malware or bot networks, but because they rank so high in this list, it sounds like it should be feasible to keep a blocklist somewhat up to date.
Re: Top DNS domains seen on the Quad9 recursive resolver array each day
#18Re: Top DNS domains seen on the Quad9 recursive resolver array each day
#19Earlier quoted context omitted.
Or malware, those would typically be fairly random domain names that are queried for updates or instructions by a large number of infected devices.
That's what I'm thinking too. That would suggest some very large operational botnets ... :-/
Re: Top DNS domains seen on the Quad9 recursive resolver array each day
#20I don't see how it would be possible to produce this table under Quad9's privacy policy. Nothing in their privacy policy says that they maintain logs that would enable them to count queries by label. Can anyone explain?
That said, I think it's entirely reasonable for them to log domains alone if they're completely disconnected from any user activity, i.e. a simple "increment the counter for foo.com" is reasonable since that's unrelated to user privacy.