31–40 of 294 posts
Is it time for a new benchmark of "how easy is it to turn this AI into a 4chan poster", maybe it is since this seems to be an axis that Elon seems to want to distinguish his AI offering from everyone else's along.
Luckily we don't need a benchmark for "how easy is it to turn this AI into a bluesky poster", since they can all already do that
Claude Code converted me from paying $0 for LLMs to $200 per month. Any co that wants a chance at getting that $200 ($300 is fine too) from me needs a Claude Code equivalent and a model where the equivalent's tools were part of its RL environment. I don't think I can go back to pasting code into a chat interface, no matter how great the model is.
How does Claude code, trained to use its tools, compare to a model agnostic equivalentsuch as aider? Have you tried both?
> My best guess is that these lines in the prompt were the root of the problem: The second line was recently removed, per the GitHub: https://github.com/xai-org/grok-prompts/commit/c5de4a14feb50...
Earlier quoted context omitted.
How does Claude Code at $200 compare to their basic one, at $20?
It's exactly the same, but the $20 one will almost certainly run out of its daily token alliance if you try to use it for more than an hour or so.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
How does Claude Code at $200 compare to their basic one, at $20?
It's exactly the same, but the $20 one will almost certainly run out of its daily token alliance if you try to use it for more than an hour or so.
There's also a $100 version that's indeed the same as the $200 one but with less usage.
Is it time for a new benchmark of "how easy is it to turn this AI into a 4chan poster", maybe it is since this seems to be an axis that Elon seems to want to distinguish his AI offering from everyone else's along.
Luckily we don't need a benchmark for "how easy is it to turn this AI into a bluesky poster", since they can all already do that